/lit/ - Literature

>>18473636
>Were Plato, the father of western philosophy, and Aeschylus, the father of greek tragedy, revisionist fags too?
I haven't read the Banquet yet. I suppose is there where you're drawing this claim.
What does EXATCLY they say?

>im not part of your discussion, but I find etymologcial meaning searching fags to almost be worse than revisionist fags.
The greeks had THREE words for love. Don't you find curious that not even once do they use EROS to refer to their claimed "sexual" relationship?

Is the love of Jesus also a sexual one, for instance?
When the tradition call its adepts "Brides of Christ" does it mean they will eventually be banged by the Messiah?

>At the end of the day you can see them as just unusually close and loving friends if you wish, but you cant negate this interpretation (which dates back to classical Greece) as invalid or incorrect.
So this is just like "Batman and Robin"?
There might be something between them, huh? Since this interpretation dates back so many decades. Lol

Is like two men just CAN'T have a really close friendship or they will automatically be put under suspection.
I know I'm gonna get shit because of this but a good chunk of Bronze Age Mindset talks preciselly about this kind of stuff.
Is like simply CAN NOT exist a deep sense of camaraderie between two males: "They GOT to be gays. Since my porn-rotten mind just can't conceive this kind of sound soul relationship."
Utter bullshit.
Get lost!