[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:

View post   
>> No.20154771 [View]
File: 98 KB, 1000x983, 4E761073-780A-4A42-A9F1-4D900510C4A1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20154771

>>20154634
Probably because they don’t believe in it. Imo anyone who insists on aligning themselves entirely on one side of the nature vs nurture debate is retarded and dogmatic. The people who think everything is determined by evolution or genetic code are just as bad as the people who think everything is socially constructed. There are obviously behaviours that evolve over millions of years (like breastfeeding), but the eroticisation of breasts is inessential to the reproductive process, any partial object can be an object of desire. So it should be a reasonable enough assumption that erogenous zones are socially constructed, there is nothing inherently sexual about tig ol’ bitties (gotta love em tho)

>> No.16523518 [View]
File: 98 KB, 1000x983, 1587365692253.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16523518

>>16523503

>> No.15739063 [View]
File: 98 KB, 1000x983, 1591175598971.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15739063

>>15739036
>I think the story about bringing home rocks is spurious
gib greentext pls

>> No.15266038 [View]
File: 98 KB, 1000x983, lpJnM8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15266038

>>15266020

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]