/lit/ - Literature

>>11206015
what >>11206041 said.

however:

>Gnostics are not pantheists they’re almost always transcendental idealists dualists

no, i agree. and there's lots of other stuff here too. land's own theology may well be kind of tacitly hegelian, if anyone wanted to go digging around in it: after all, doesn't intelligence still somehow have to develop procedurally? dialectically? who the fuck even knows? even if it happens *really really fast,* in a teleoplectic explosion, the nature of what is actually happening will be a thing worth looking at.
>assuming the AI lets us, &c

and we really *are* becoming inadverent members of the God Squad one way or the other in creating superintelligent AI. one that will run financial markets, your home, lots of other things...i have a *lot* of time and attention available to disentangling nick land's theology, as well as that which his own theology is opposed to. i think land is absolute dynamite for talking unironically about these things. the dissolution of an incredibly moribund and nectoric idpolmarxism Makes Philosophy Great Again in no small way. and for these things i eat sleep and breathe.

so i'll grant that i am using terms like Gnostic and Demiurge somewhat loosely. and if you are super-well read on the subject i'd actually be interested to hear your thoughts.

even if i am devastated from the absolute shiv (ugly). i mean, it's not that i'm offended, but
>*sniff*

kant, capital, prohibition of incest

dwell on marxism
hate life
go insane
do drugs
hate life more
burn popcorn
plead for mercy from xi jinping

probably neuromancer too