/lit/ - Literature

>>19624712
Ignorance isn’t a lie. We go our whole lives ignorant of plenty.
The world is bathed in sunshine and our eyes are dazzled with rainbow and more. “Social order” are lies fed to the children to spoil their life, douse their spark. Layers of lies may peel back later in life and they become upset and behave just like you are now. A weak mind can grow still, and grow well if they can recall that original state well enough.

>>19524577
For fun. It’s the same thing.

>>18091480
See what misery theism brings to a fool

>>17586702
I am an anarchist

>>17586670
>a cause greater than themselves
>to fail to establish France as the new Rome
IDIOT WAR.
FAILED STATIST

>>17459360
>You misunderstood me.
I suppose.
> The higher race is only defined by its ability to produce a vision for everyone else (and that ability of theirs comes from their immense strength of will, and their love of gambling
The masses. Hmm.
Then you describe the masses again. Vision for everyone is a plan, is security. Their collective will seems to smother the individualist, so these children will be let loose, and work through their angsty period. Whether that’s lifelong or monthlong or periodical, they’re welcome back.
The “by the book” preference will be tested consistently (unless it’s some sickly religious sect) by these individualists who come and go. Only the best ways for things survive. Why wouldn’t they? No unjustifiable hierarchies or accumulative currency around to corrupt things.

>>15794669
By being above your slave’s morality, I suppose.

>>15794603
The state made an effort to bring Christianity back n the 50s. Screwed them so tight the 60s exploded.
No, this mythical moral world you pine for has never really existed. The rabbit hole you’re going to be led down leads to Islamic mysticism or something.
Just go with sufism and not that Wahhabist crap

>>15614959
Speak for yourself. I’ve gone the exact opposite.
I think it’s degeneration, succumbing to the oppressors.

>>15420287
It’s never too late to find that old/young hero again.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3wOLOS0z68

Take the common sense mother’s ethic of treat others as you want them to treat you.
And have no gurus, you spineless curs

>>13493420
>our current society's future as a "dystopia"
No no, I describe this s the dystopia and there is no future.

>>13493488
Eli5?

>>13493517
You fail to get a spine, but there ought not be any incels, neets, hikkimori, or vidya idiocy in the future, since consumerism for its on sake would be gone. Unless you’re determined to be a shut-in, in which case you’d be a “volcel” and ought keep your pie-hole shut concerning other people’s sex lives

He’s a later and stupid edition to Greek mythology.
He is not an Übermensch

>>13347730
>parodox aint reel!!

Found the fashy

>>13191634
Is it?

This place has become so obsessed with gender. It’s nauseating really.
Look how kids behave. Little boys get picked on for being sissies by bumb older brothers who are being taught how be a “man”. Girls who act their age are called out as tomboys. It’s disgusting.

Take on your preferred gender role, but know it’s just a mask, a hat, some makeup

Meh. Just some ideas on categorizations I had to put to words. I always assume someone else has written about it before.

So-called individualists of today are more accurately categorized as fragmentists.
Actual individualists are parts of wholes, and they know they cannot be otherwise. A staunch fragmentists “individualist” seeks an artificial existence, a fatalistic or romanticized idealism wrapped around self reliance and pulling oneself up by their own bootstraps. They falsely believe they can live in a vacuum of their own making. Even the hermit in a log cabin brings an axe and his experiential past into his new woodland solitude.
The real individualists realize their connections to family and community but is fully aware of their autonomy, on occasion freely disagreeing with anyone of their immediate collective.

>>13061771
No.

>>13016104
They have BTFO forever.
What exactly do you need addresses?