[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.19318193 [View]
File: 96 KB, 329x263, beans.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19318193

Novel talks about a women whose ankles/hair is implied to be showing

>> No.19076862 [View]
File: 96 KB, 329x263, beans.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19076862

>>19076749
>All language is based

>> No.19007560 [View]
File: 96 KB, 329x263, beans.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19007560

>>19006728
Yah, I really struggle with trying to convay this to people. a particular has its own absolute in relation to itself. However, a prior concept to that is universiality. So another perspective must necissarily be within it. However that on particular has a different absolute that is equally universal and has that previous particular within it. its hard to explain because the construct envelopes itself a prioi.

I think the best way of expressing it is
>"given x and y, we may assume the universals a and b"
therefor you are not claiming a paradoxal universal (which, desu are unavoidable in serious atempt to be particular and accurate), but simply assuming a particular sequence of development.

Its like talking about universes. Universes are supposed to be universal, containing everything within itself. but hypothetically there could be multiple universes, a different strate of totality in itself, kind of making the term universe unmerited.

I think Hegel talked about this.

>> No.17948267 [View]
File: 96 KB, 329x263, beans.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17948267

>>17948033
>he didnt assert himself with the assyrians

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]