/lit/ - Literature

I only judge literature by the author's physiognomy.

.

are the cathedral and the deep state the same concept?

I'm a zoomer and as such I missed the golden age of blogging (usually people locate this period between 2000-2010), what are some high quality blogs from that period I should read to get the feel of these times?
>inb4 not literature
Some bloggers like Land and Moldbug feature very often on /lit/ and threads with their works don't get banned, it's also worth noticing the popularity of both libertarianism and MMT style progressivism/Keynesianism is driven entirely by blogging culture, blogpost is a form of literary expression in no way inferior to the traditional modes.

>UHMMMMMMMMMMM
>AND UHMMMMMMMMMMMMM

Is Mencius Moldbug's work of any value?

Is this nerdy half Jewish loser who wants to go back to monarchism really the peak of right wing intellectual thought?

>Not all humans are born the same, of course, and the innate character and intelligence of some is more suited to mastery than slavery. For others, it is more suited to slavery. And others still are badly suited to either. These characteristics can be expected to group differently in human populations of different origins. Thus, Spaniards and Englishmen in the Americas in the 17th and earlier centuries, whose sense of political correctness was negligible, found that Africans tended to make good slaves and Indians did not. This broad pattern of observation is most parsimoniously explained by genetic differences.

>Not all humans are born the same, of course, and the innate character and intelligence of some is more suited to mastery than slavery. For others, it is more suited to slavery. And others still are badly suited to either. These characteristics can be expected to group differently in human populations of different origins. Thus, Spaniards and Englishmen in the Americas in the 17th and earlier centuries, whose sense of political correctness was negligible, found that Africans tended to make good slaves and Indians did not. This broad pattern of observation is most parsimoniously explained by genetic differences.

>Not all humans are born the same, of course, and the innate character and intelligence of some is more suited to mastery than slavery. For others, it is more suited to slavery. And others still are badly suited to either. These characteristics can be expected to group differently in human populations of different origins. Thus, Spaniards and Englishmen in the Americas in the 17th and earlier centuries, whose sense of political correctness was negligible, found that Africans tended to make good slaves and Indians did not. This broad pattern of observation is most parsimoniously explained by genetic differences.

So I read this and I have to ask how on earth can anyone this brainlet hack take seriously?
https://americanmind.org/essays/the-clear-pill-part-1-of-5-the-four-stroke-regime/

Lowtreshold his style is an attrocity and hightreshold his ideas are manipulative, lowbrow and lazy

chinlet

>>13812726
Nick, this is your master Moldbug telling you to call it off. we've been infiltrated.