/lit/ - Literature

>>15264973
Insufficient argumentation.
What I am saying is: "the concept of truth is invalid". And it is invalid in the same way that dividing by zero is invalid. Not "nonexistent", which would render it a paradox. If it does exist, it is something completely out of our ability to grasp, measure and interact with. Therefore, there is no sense thinking about it.

>>15264973
"If you can't change something, no need to worry about it because it's out of your hands. If you can, then no worries because you can change it!". Interesting idea from the ancient stoics, but practically impossible to live by. Otherwise worrying would have been eliminated for two millennia.
The reason I bring up I'm a scientist, is because people regard science as an rarely-fallible sharp tool of reason, whereas in reality more than 50% of accepted work is garbage, not even an acceptable approximation of what's going on.