/lit/ - Literature

>>14543267
>Just because it has resisted all attempts at falsification does not mean that it is a final or complete theory and no physicist, historical or contemporary, has ever made such a claim. It is just you.
> Just because it has resisted all attempts at falsification does not mean that it is a final or complete theory and no physicist, historical or contemporary, has ever made such a claim. It is just you.
> Just because it has resisted all attempts at falsification does not mean that it is a final or complete theory and no physicist, historical or contemporary, has ever made such a claim. It is just you.
>Just because it has resisted all attempts at falsification does not mean that it is a final or complete theory and no physicist, historical or contemporary, has ever made such a claim. It is just you.
>Solar eclipse of May 29, 1919
>Multiple tests of general relativity and deflection of light by the sun
BTFO'd and assraped

>Asking whether Kant's categories necessitate euclidean geometry is putting the cart before the horse.
Ok, that's what I thought.