/lit/ - Literature

HOW THE FUCK IS THIS FAGGOTRY REAL
LIKE NIGGA STOP THINKING ABOUT YOUR EGO AND WRITE WHAT YOU WANNA WRITE

GODDAMNN

I saw Max Stitner at a grocery store in Friedrichstadt yesterday. I told him how cool it was to meet him in person, but I didn’t want to be a douche and bother him and ask him for photos or anything.

He said, “Oh, like you’re doing now?”

I was taken aback, and all I could say was “Huh?” but he kept cutting me off and going “huh? huh? huh?” and closing his hand shut in front of my face. I walked away and continued with my shopping, and I heard him chuckle as I walked off. When I came to pay for my stuff up front I saw him trying to walk out the doors with like fifteen milk jugs in his hands without paying.

The girl at the counter was very nice about it and professional, and was like “Sir, you need to pay for those first.” At first he kept pretending to be tired and not hear her, but eventually turned back around and brought them to the counter.

When she took one of the bars and started scanning it multiple times, he stopped her and told her to scan them each individually “to prevent any electrical infetterence,” and then turned around and winked at me. I don’t even think that’s a word. After she scanned each bar and put them in a bag and started to say the price, he kept interrupting her by yawning really loudly.

>>14649299
But Stirner memes are some of the only funny /lit/ memes that exist though.

>>14202824
Me too

>>13996933
Its just bad bait calm down anon.

>>13659194
>"""human rights"""
I unironically hate this term.
Noone has an inherent right to anything other than death, no matter how nice it would be if it were otherwise. It conjures images of a man yelling at a storm "I have the right to housing so don't wreck it!".
Should be called "ethical guidelines" or something similar instead.

You can erase one philosopher from history, choose wisely.

political systems will never favor the great. they will create false definitions of greatness to uphold their own order.

systems are for the weak, the great do not rise by them but in spite of them.

>>13249335
And you're not wrong.

>15
conservative
>17
right libertarian
>19
left anarchist
>21
nietzschean
>23
egoist

>>13102764
>enslaving us
>literal slave morality
WEW

>>12929144

>>12478538
>he buys digital media instead of just downloading
lmao

>>12332544
What about him?

>>12307333
>Wherever her feet tread, there shall I be, if only as a spectre, in spirit, weeping and kissing the ground that has known her feet's intrusion, their tyranny!
fucking based

>>12301059
they got pretty stale after a while desu, but here you go

>>11225331
Seriously, just take the pdf without paying for it. Max and Wolfi would want you to.

>>10956569
this desu I'm surprised to hear everybody dumping on the guy for mentioning Nabokov to a girl. Ya'll need to spend more time hanging out at pretentious unis and liberal arts schools. Pseud girls also love pretending to have read Infinite Jest. If OP was talking to the right girl he would have a perfect in.

>>10744113
I like to distill an idea into a character if that makes sense, i.e. they're almost the physical embodiment of a concept. That character then drives the plot development and the rest of the characters follow. I know it's a little 19th century but it can lead to interesting results with contemporary topics and experimental stylistics and narrative structure. At least that's what I'm trying with my novel in the works. It could be total shit and my method is shit.

>>10708579
I think we all know the answer to that one

>>10681614
>>10681615
Max "The Specter Deflector" Stirner

>>10648697
Right, I said it must be faulty on the basis of the axiom, not that everything she has ever said must be wrong as a result of the incorrect axiom. But if we recognize the fault in the axiom then we can at least pick over the carcass of her philosophy, so to speak, and consume the choice bits of meat, without feeling obliged to resuscitate it.

Let's suppose that existence is the state of having objective reality. If existence exists, this means that the state of having objective reality has objective reality. But if this is the case, the state of having objective reality, itself having objective reality, must also have objective reality (i.e. the existence of existence exists). And so on down the line. One can also criticize her axiom on the basis of the law of non-contradiction, since if the state of having objective reality has objective reality, that would mean that the state is an object in reality, which would further mean that there objects in reality that do not possess the state of having objective reality, since we said the state was a particular object: a contradiction.

To me she's just a moral individualist in the guise of an egoist and anything worthwhile she arrived at was already propounded by Stirner a century before she came on the scene.

>>10548058
Do you think johann kaspar schmidt didn't exist?Please explain, whose books have I been masturbating too?

>>10104071
>A pragmatic observation of cultural and ethnic unity
Gibberish. Observation is not a practice, and of itself it is not pragmatic.
>that is meant to ease governance by not allowing for internal strife
How does this work out, "pragmatically" speaking?