[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.21063235 [View]
File: 32 KB, 338x281, flashing my badge.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21063235

>>21063228
>You can't magically kill everyone
it doenst have to be instant. it can take 10000 years because 10000 years / remaining life of the universe == 0.00000000000000000000000000000001 or approximately 0

>you don't know the consequences of killing everyone
LMAO yeah ok man, if there is no one left in the universe, the consequences DO NOT MATTER because NO ONE IS THERE TO EXPERIENCE THE CONSEQUENCES. Are you fucking stupid?

>What that anon offered isn't "killing everyone" either.
you said terrorism OR senseless violence. what is more senseless than killing all things just because they are alive?

im not an antinatalist, but you should really KYS
verification not required

>> No.20448301 [View]
File: 33 KB, 338x281, 1644459508486.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20448301

>Recent studies have shown that they direct less time than girls to process words
Maybe they're just smarter so they don't have to spend as much time thinking about the definition of words?
>that they’re more prone to skipping passages or entire sections of books
Many books have pointless filler in them. If you're just looking to get the general idea there's no reason not to skim.
>and that they frequently pick books that are beneath their reading levels.
Reading isn't a competition to see who can read the "hardest" books.

The only thing to be concerned about here is that boys read less than girls in general, but with reading one should be more concerned about the quality of what they're reading rather than the quantity. I would rather young boys read one classic every year instead of a dozen shitty YA novels in a month. Young boys probably shouldn't be reading much anyways and should focus on more active things such as sports and constructive hobbies. I could argue that reading itself is a passive feminine activity with the exception of really good books that truly engage the reader. Women probably also watch more TV than men because that is similarly cheap passive entertainment.

>> No.20289590 [View]
File: 33 KB, 338x281, 1630549418463.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20289590

>>20289580
>your personal experiences are wrong also these statistics that back up your personal experiences are wrong too im right because uhhh

>> No.20047026 [View]
File: 33 KB, 338x281, 1630549418463.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20047026

>>20047009
>Putin
stopped reading here, couldn't care less whether you suck his dick or pretend he's evil or whatever. not my problem

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]