/lit/ - Literature

>>18001961
>Music has a way of controling your senses.
yes, isnt that the purpose of art? you need to sort yourself out, anon. something's clearly bothering you

>>17879646
>Set in 1882
>The glock was moving in his hands

>>14380440
>That fag can keep the c'h in his name but you cant'

You're not supposed to save thumbnails lads

>>13077286
>>13077390

It was not my will to exist, he forced me to do so. Therefore, before my existence he did not care about my free will. So why would he care about it after? In other words, he forces me to exist(trumping my free will) in order for me to have a free will. What's even worse is that if I were to commit suicide, he'd punish me for it. That's like a father forcing a kid to go to his grandma's house, telling him he can choose to not go if he wants to... but when he chooses to not go, the child gets punished. The child never free to do anything. The only way out of this, is to admit that God is evil, which he undoubtly is, and move on. If you use the evilness of god as an axiom, you don't even need to go through all of the mental gymnastics of "free will" and "the best of all possible worlds".

>>13077286
>>13077390

It was not my will to exist, he forced me to do so. Therefore, before my existence he did not care about my free will. So why would he care about it after? In other words, he forces me to exist(trumping my free will) in order for me to have a free will. What's even worse is that if I were to commit suicide, he'd punish me for it. That's like a father forcing a kid to go to his grandma's house, telling him we can choose to not go if he wants to... and when he chooses to not go, the child gets punished. The child never free to do anything. The only way out of this, is to admit that God is evil, which he undoubtly is, and move on. If you use the evilness of god as an axiom, you don't even need to go through all of the mental gymnastics of "free will" and "the best of all possible worlds".

What the fuck is this, retards?

>>12874204
There is no evidence for this, and you are non of those.

>>12829318
>The Odyssey
>No Iliad

>>10242116
is it too late for me if this kind of rhetoric speaks to me on a more fundamental level than contemporary "humanist" platitudes?

>that guy who puts his book down his pants and sniffs the smell

>>9162791
>want to write about man being master of his destiny
>spend 5 years agonizing over how to say it in a historical fiction novel
>well-read people: "Lol, are you writing YA fanfiction? This shit is so cliched"
>shelley wants to write about man being master of his destiny
>talks to his friends about it
>they say it sounds like a cool idea
>hammers out first draft over the weekend
>publishes second draft
>world-renowned

>"Do the ancients think non-compatibilist free will exists"
>"Yes and no. You see, it's very complicated.."'
>"Do Christians think non-compatibilist free will exists"
>"God either hates you and no, or God appears at every moment to will your act to be free but it's still mostly not free, but that's freedom. You see, it's very complicated.."
>"Does Hegel think non-compatibilist free will exists"
>"For Hegel, the problem of free will is simply avoided. You see, it's very complicated.."
>"Does Kant think non-compatibilist free will exists"
>"You see, it's very complicated.."
>"Do modern philosophers think non-compatibilist free will exist"
>"No, b-but compatibilism is just as good!! Y-you see, it's very complicated.."