/lit/ - Literature

>>20262987
Wife am I looking at

>>18506097

>>17475049
How could you defend Hume? Kant 360noscoped him when he built his trascendental deduction on the only fact about subjectivity that Hume conceced. Either you say that Hume did not concede that fact either (namely that we are bundle of perceptions, or in Kantian terms, that the I think accompanies all my representations), turning him de facto in a full-blown skeptic, or you concede that Hume was wrong in stopping his analysis there. And once the trascendental deduction is established, all the problems about causality, substantiality, etc., are solved