/lit/ - Literature

>>17919078
!ALERT!
!ALERT!

HEAR YE HEAR YE
MAKE WAY
KINOSSEUR AFICIONADO COMING THROUGH
ONLY THE KINOEST BASEDEST & REDPILLED COMFIEST PATRICIAN CORE PLEB FILTER OBSCURE EXIT LEVEL QUINTESSENTIAL CINEMA BELOW
HERE IT COMES

The Cat in the Hat (2003)
The Passion of the Christ (2004)
The Pest (1997)
Ed Wood (1994)
Problem Child 2 (1991)
Videodrome (1983)
Pain & Gain (2013)
Super Mario Bros. (1993)
American Psycho (2000)
Batman & Robin (1997)
Face/Off (1997)
DELLAMORTE DELLAMORE (1994)
The Texas Chain Saw Massacre (the one with Jessica Biel)
Sucker Punch (2011)
Tron: Legacy (2010)
Total Recall (1990)
Waterworld (1995)
Eyes Wide Shut (1999)
Kingdom of Heaven Directors Cut (2005)

Simply good and honest cinema 's all

i happen to be reading Ulysses. no appreciable difference.

>>17856791
this is the actual, boring explanation for the rise of vtubers and waifuism and prison gays and femboys and every other popularized fetish in recent years. men dont wanna talk to women so they pursue other venues to express their lust and desires.

Why, again, start with the greeks and not indo-chinese?

>>16819761
Of course I do, you retard. The difference is that Amazon has a monopoly on virtually every aspect of the market as it stands, and whether they decide to push drag queen story hour hardly impacts their bottom line at this point. That's not the case when your immediate potential customer base is 0.0001% of Amazon's. You're probably the owner; in that case, dilate, and I'll keep sending my money to Mr. Bezos.

>>16675714
I discuss music, literature and philosophy with my wife and then fuck her until she cries. Seethe.

>>16630477
>Basically you are a machine that is trying to replicate its genes
wrong off the bat, lol
>t.sex is disgusting, offspring death, and family prison

Give me a book which I would enthusiastically read even though I have, in actuality, no real interest in much of anything at all.

Go.

One painter guy from Spain came up with a definition for this retarded nonsense "art". He calls it "hamparte" ("hampa" = scum, "arte = art):

If one or several objects manufactured in series, which are found for sale in the common market and are being presented as art pieces, these are Hamparte.

If the piece consists in the selection of an object (objet trouvé, found art or ready-made), which is magically made up into a piece of art, just because of the fact of being located in an exhibitions place of any kind, then it is Hamparte.

If talent is not required to make a piece as the shown one, if it is full of common places and trite ideas, it is Hamparte.

If the only value held of the piece is fundamentally sustained by a conscientious theoretical/philosophical/political text, which finds no real reflection on the piece, then it is Hamparte.

The unrealistic and magical attributions of nonexistent values to objects that are being commercialized in the art market with an exorbitant price, it is Hamparte.

An artist never acquires the right of being one. The artist must demonstrate it permanently. Even though the artist has made great art pieces, it doesn’t mean everything this person does is art. Hamparte can be done consciously or unconsciously. If it is done unconsciously then this would be made by a pure Hampartist. If it is done to make evident or denounce what is happening in the market and art world, or just by the pleasure of doing it, then it would be done by a realistic Hampartist. All the pieces which are made under these terms would be Hamparte.

Fundamentally, the art of having no talent is Hamparte.

>>15967070
>resorts to calling others "women" (the very people he hates) and fantasizes about talking to "real women" after he's exposed as a fraud
You're being a triggered, bitch.

Hello, kings.
Post the titles of 3 highwit books, 3 midwit books and 3 dimwit books.

>>15851569
>>15851601
lets hope it becomes a reality and ends like all those video games where the immortal being desperately wants to kill himself and searches for aeons to do so

sounds familiar
>mortal being tries to find a way to make himself immortal and searches for aeons

there is no pleasure without pain and there is only pain without pleasure

>>15476760
>Evil does exist in a metaphysical sense.
where is the proof for that? Try to come up with something that cannot be explained as an ammoral result of cause and effect and sociobiological competition, group dynamics, aggression stemming from evolution etc
> The fact you're not a physicalist while still a moral nihilist points to a lack of insight on your part.
A moral nihilist denies that morality has any meaning. I maintain that God is omniscient and good, so I'm not a moral nihilist. If morality had no meaning or no reality then God would not be good.
>You're not a physicalist, so this stuff is not sufficient when analyzing the nature of evil.
Why not? Am I not allowed to also believe in evolution and cause and effect if I also believe in God? What an absurd proposition
>>15476796
>this isn't proof though anon....
I don't need to offer proof for Santa Claus my nigga, If someone comes up to me and says "refute the problem of adjfniaehfiagfiaybf or God doesn't exist" I would say "What is adjfniaehfiagfiaybf and where is the proof for it?" The same situation applies to evil
>>15476803
>If the concept of evil is so conditional, how do you explain its arising independently everywhere?
As I have already said once, that a majority believe in something doesn't prove it's real. The same argument turned on its head proves the existence of God, ghosts, ancestor spirits, the afterlife, magic etc because all of them appear all throughout history in almost every culture. Also, it could simply be something in the way that humans have evolved which has engendered this belief. It may be evolutionary beneficial