/lit/ - Literature

Damascius already confronted this.
The ascension to the Ineffable Nothingness is twofold, reverting to the One. It's as if 0 is an upward emanation of himself (the One) eternally transcending himself; and this 'absolute beyond: is what produces Being/Nous.
The Father is his own Son.

>>13718735
>Makes inter-subjective value judgements based on nothing but emotion criticizing others for doing the same
>not realising that his values are as unsubstantial as any other belief, scientifically speaking

>>13559737
>>13559741
Desire is founded on Habit.
But you shouldn't be too binary, yes we can transform but we can't break the form. What one finds pleasurable and indulge in isn't necessarily what one's essence yearns for; it is why addicts are depressed, they're unfulfilled. We cannot change this deepest yearning, but we can fool ourselves into another (and enjoy it). But in the last chapters of our life we will find ourselves torn and regretful.

>Like all childless (because of their lifestyle) middle aged women.

Heretical BLANDA UPP cherrypicking of Zoroastrianism, gospels and, platonic/hellenic terminology, with random false Orphic and Egyptian symbolism.
Traditonless and accursed, scam artists playing at prophecy, they're the poison in the well of Wisdom.

The First God is beyond Being.

Fuck off with your coalescing metaphysics. The One isn't a mushy mess like a black hole.
One>Many
The Many are contingent on the One. All thingS participate the One.

>>13230740
>Of the First-born king, the neverending One; and upon him all the immortals grew, blessed gods and goddesses and rivers and lovely springs and everything else that had then been born; and he himself became the sole One.