/lit/ - Literature

Because brainletism thats why.

People are incapable of reading and fathoming the first two critiques. Which is ironic and sad as the third is possibly the greatest and most ennobling of them in that it draws the prior two together and validates and hamonises them. I feel this is expressed when in second crit, also the first partup till the moral law which is his epitaph.

>Two things fill the mind with ever new and increasing admiration and awe, the more often and steadily we reflect upon them: the starry heavens above me and the moral law within me. I do not seek or conjecture either of them as if they were veiled obscurities or extravagances beyond the horizon of my vision; I see them before me and connect them immediately with the consciousness of my existence.

Also this from the third crit- can we not deduce political solutions herefrom?:

>A man abandoned by himself on a desert island would adorn neither his hut nor his person; nor would he seek for flowers, still less would he plant them, in order to adorn himself therewith. It is only in society that it occurs to him to be not merely a man, but a refined man after his kind (the beginning of civilization). For such do we judge him to be who is both inclined and apt to communicate his pleasure to others, and who is not contented with an object if he cannot feel satisfaction in it in common with others. Again, every one expects and requires from every one else this reference to universal communication of pleasure, as it were from an original compact dictated by humanity itself.

>>13012858
There has never been any OP. Men are but the bridge.
>>13012896
Were all Bonapartist in retrospect. Who wouldn't be? He certainly is my candidate for one who has crossed furthest towards being overman.
>>13012922
Super based.

The discourse on inequality.

*btw this man is colossal af. No wonder the frogs did what they did.

>>12831944
Good work. His smile is your reward.