/lit/ - Literature

>>11008689
Give me literally one thing in the Catechism you disagree with.

Since you’re a prot, start with:
Transubstantiation(since god apparently can’t perform miracles)
Papal infallibility(The phrase “I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on Earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on Earth shall be loosed in heaven.” Doesn’t actually mean what it says)
Selling indulgences(because that’s clearly a thing that happens in currentyear)
The deuterocanon(because people before Luther all had a false bible, but it was still divinely inspired)
Purgatory(remember, you get to ignore Maccabees, see above)
Intercession of saints(see above)
Confession(“Whose sins you forgive are forgiven them, and whose sins you retain are retained” isn’t a bible verse)

>>10980630
> What does it profit, my brethren, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can faith save him? If a brother or sister is naked and destitute of daily food, and one of you says to them, “Depart in peace, be warmed and filled,” but you do not give them the things which are needed for the body, what does it profit? Thus also faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead.

SOLA FIDE IS WRONG

>>10979751
Cunt, the bible gives Peter authority over the Church and rejects faith without works as a path to salvation. Prots are WRONG.