/lit/ - Literature

His surface level critique of cultural decline and vulgarization and are somewhat appealing to me, but I ultimately his critiques have their foundation in wacky hyperborean UFO flying Arctic Aryan lunacy. I think, if you are going to go the reactionary route, he is worth being familiar with and some of his rhetorical attacks on modernity are ok, but you can get the same elsewhere at a higher quality without the baggage, and even if you wanted that baggage you can get that too elsewhere at a higher standard.

This may be slightly unkind, but he reminds me of a tinfoil hat version of Stefan Molyneux, who like Evola, is just educated enough in a great deal of topics to have an opinion on nearly everything, but non of it is particularly original, insightful or deep. A hair's breadth away from being a full blown con-man.