/lit/ - Literature

>>17834587
>>17834948
>>17835049
Or, you know, both were described in the bible so its really just le wowie zoowism.
"In the year of King Uzziah’s death I saw the Lord sitting on a throne, lofty and exalted, with the train of His robe filling the temple. Seraphim stood above Him, each having six wings: with two he covered his face, and with two he covered his feet, and with two he flew. And one called out to another and said,
“Holy, Holy, Holy, is the Lord of hosts,
The whole earth is full of His glory.”
>Isaiah 6:1-3

"And this was their appearance: they had a human likeness, but each had four faces, and each of them had four wings. Their legs were straight, and the soles of their feet were like the sole of a calf's foot. And they sparkled like burnished bronze. Under their wings on their four sides they had human hands. And the four had their faces and their wings thus."
>Ezekiel 1:5-8

So it doesnt even make sense when literally a few books back they imply a human figure. And it awlays comes down to
>its so lovecraft xd
Im not even christian, but it just seems insipid "erm actually" when its not even true. Maybe if instead it was "biblically accurate angels" it was "these other biblically accurate angels" that would be one thing. but people treated it like a "factorino" even when its not.