[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.22909692 [View]
File: 593 KB, 1009x975, philosopher-personality if forced to choose.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22909692

>>22908941
>>22900887
Move aside. Global skeptic-Chad coming through.

>> No.22898247 [View]
File: 593 KB, 1009x975, philosopher-personality if forced to choose.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22898247

>>22897908
I agree, this is the difficulty. /his/ and /pol/ are filled with unread idiots. Along with /pol/ being unusably fast for effortposting, sometimes before I finish reading, and I'm not that slow a reader, the thread will have hit its limit.

Relatedly>>22892038, the arbitrary deletion of philosophy threads is bad for effortposting. Sometimes a thread sucks around for a week, other times the same topic gets quickly deleted. If like a solution for that.

>> No.21469511 [View]
File: 593 KB, 1009x975, philosopher-personality if forced to choose.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21469511

>>21469372
They might. The illusion that is your impression of the world could be far more encouraging than you believe. You might be only one of those cells living an imagined existence, with only the vaguest representation of the world. Perhaps you, the cell, are to trigger when encountering the color pink, which in your hallucination you experience as someone being wrong on the Internet. Thus another sweet berry is found and your collective survives a bit longer. Hooray for you.

>>21469464
Wait are these supposed to be jokes?

>> No.21384892 [View]
File: 593 KB, 1009x975, philosopher-personality if forced to choose.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21384892

>>21384622
Please point to the time when the soft sciences were productive and well run.

>>21384239
A distinction without a difference.

>>21384355
I mean they might be related, but also maybe not. If so, then what are you "discovering"? Just some random portion of the mathematical multiverse?

>>21384784
Ok maybe microbiology or such. But mostly humans have yet to successfully apply scientific methodology to those soft areas. And maybe, >>21384622, they never will.

>>21384798
A mathematician and a linguist walk into a bar... Science?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]