/lit/ - Literature

>>21362453
you were determined to say that

>>19785160
You might be interested in Deleuze's early lecture course "What Is Grounding?" If you haven't read it already. Imo he and others of that generation have a sort of mystical root ground ala Boehme where the pure subject (a-subjective or pre-subjective subjectivity like Fichte's absolute I) is grounded in a groundless self recursive ungrund. For instance with Deleuze an pre-representational and a-personal evental flows there is no longer any possibility of determination but only the indeterminate field of and immanent virtuality. Bergson connects that to the elan vital, but for Deleuze there is only chaos and complexity, everything is the emission and reception of the Sign. Herein lies the possibility for a genuine neo-Heraclitean discourse of the Logos. WTP itself is just a description of the process of immanent affects (forces intermingling through a schema of interior and exterior; inhibition and ex-stasis). Not enough space here to really go into this but this is kind of where Deleuze begins to build the notion of pure becoming a and difference as opposed to representational spaces that reflexively retain substantial loci.

>>16470477
>not appreciating the sheer power of image, motion and time
books cannot do what cinema does and cinema cannot do all that books can. Anyone who thinks books are inherently better than movies just doesn't understand cinema nor art in general.
Read Cinema 1+2

not gonna read