/lit/ - Literature

>>22454295
>Attempting to steer it in a new direction, rather. It's possible, it just takes a lot of work.
Ah so you are indeed a Marxist.
>Of course, but they pretty soon won't need men for protection thanks to technology. Then what? Are you going to try to go back to the old ways, an approach that has never been shown to work? Or will you join the effort to re-educate them so they appreciate other qualities in men?
More Marxist delusion that they will reshape the world in both technology and humanity.
>I'm a heterosexual male.
God help you. What an unmasculine and unchristian mind, truly rationality deserts you as femininity takes shape in a vessel unfit for it's purpose.

>>21426298
>trying to come off as classy and patrician but you're grabbing the wine glass by the bowl
fucking vomit inducing

>>5560750
Most generic nothing response ever. 0/10 garbage disposed.
It's looking to me like /lit/ is a waste of time, I guess being slower than /pol/ doesn't mean the posters are more thoughtful after all.

You really disappoint me.

Really, a novel writing software, i don't mean we shouldn't use the technology at our disposal, but this just seems stupid, just write, you don't even need a fucking computer for that, plus fucking external structures lessen your own possibilities when writing, don't pretend to structure art into a mold, create.