/lit/ - Literature

This is the Chomsky/Foucault rap of this generation and it's bad, very, very bad and sad

>>12941252
>The new atheists set themselves up with the easy task of attacking literalist religion
Turns out the alternative is even more cringe.

>>12792522
>He’s clearly smart enough to know that what he preaches is full of shit
Elaborate. You claim he's clearly smart, what makes this so?
>if he is perfectly willing to trick millions of people and feed them what he knows to be essentially lies and false hope, all while profiting immensely, and grealy enjoying his roleplaying as a wise, deep thinker, how corrupt of a soul do you think he has
Many assertions but you're not backing any of it up.
>He’s obviously not just a quack, but a deeply dishonest and immoral man.
You've made no case here.

>>12284422
Will zoolander ever recover?

>>12072067
I recognize these speech patterns, Jordan you're pathetic man

>>10424089
Peterson used to be on a railroad crew. He's probably tough.

>>9882694

>>9663832
You walk around it and go straight to phenomenology.

>>9576233
I read Maps of Meaning and it changed my views on religion. It doesn't require anything previous, although you can evaluate it better if you are read in the areas it draws from: psychology, cybernetics, cognitive science, neuroscience, phenomenology, history, religion/mythology, and so on (I think that's fairly exhaustive).

>be an agnostic atheist, political centrist, and social liberal
>both right-wing /pol/ and left-wing /lit/ think you're a theist, right-winger, and social conservative

JUST

Anyways, I do think he has the best naturalistic approach to religion, along with Jung. Other secular accounts of religion don't stand up to it.

We /neoreaction/ now, get used to it commies
Peterson not Zizek ok. Praise Evola

>>9196506