/lit/ - Literature

>>21506567
I was only responding to the top paragraph’s racism.

Nazis libs are not to be trusted. They’d be just another flavor of today’s oligarchic west with a more Chinese looking authoritarian order. The smaller nations would suffer economic or military hardships just as we see today.
We may agree that aristocrats should be done away with, but he would continue the liberal agenda and keep the “haute bourgeoisie” and the military class in complete control. Roman imperialism with a make-believe senate of lords. Essentially the same thing as now.
If he believed the rural people’s model best, he’d be an anarchist and wish the classist system of state-capitalism gone. So why not make these rugged aristocrats of the whole world? Maybe he’ll come around. Have you come around?

> I would go a step further and argue that it's probably best to end the industrial age too.
Oh I much to say about that. Generally agree, at least to some extent. But now I’m not sure that can happen

>>21506581
>I don't agree.
You mistake what you find beautiful, and maybe what society, or life affirmation itself finds beautiful, with the true nature of the things left in a humanless vacuum. Beauty is a lovely label we stamp on things, that’s all.

>>19565730
Read that one? How about this?

>>17707743
That was great. Thank you.

>>16582323
Funny how you know his mental state and zero about zen