/lit/ - Literature

>>16902384
>his critiques were laughed at by Ramanuja and Madhva
Why do Buddhists on /lit/ try to lie and gaslight people so much? Is it because they all view Buddhism as just being a quasi-materialism where there are no real consequences for anything and no matter what when you die you are dissolved in the void? Or is it because they have become so dissociated from no-self teachings that they don't even realize what they are doing?

Ramanuja and Madhva did not laugh at Shankara's criticisms of Buddhism but they in fact copied them. Pic related is from the first part of Ramanuja's criticism of Buddhism in his Brahma Sutra commentary. See how it compares to Shankara's here >>16896720, it is mostly the same, the criticisms of Yogachara Buddhism which come after this Ramanuja largely copies from Shankara as well.

>the Buddhist had no need to 'respond' to anything he wrote because they more or less agreed with it
Yeah dude the Sarvastivadins and Yogacharas actually agreed with Shankara when he trashed them lol, what a retard