/lit/ - Literature

>>19293548
Even if they did not choose to have it, they weren't necessarily born that way, and the solution isn't to treat the symptoms but fix the underlying cause.
>Overall, homosexuals had nearly 1.7 times, and bisexuals 1.6 times, the heterosexual rate of adverse childhood experiences.
>In one major survey only 1.2 percent of males who had spent their adolescence in a rural environment responded that they had had a male sexual partner in the year of the survey while those who had spent adolescence living in metropolitan areas were close to four times (4.4 percent) more likely to report that they had had such an encounter.
I wouldn't be surprised to see something similar at play with people who claim to be nb or trans. In fact, likely even more dramatic numbers. In other cases it's clearly about culture, not an in-born trait.
>In that same survey women who attended college were nine times more likely to identify as lesbians than women who did not.
Also
>The consensus of scientific evidence overwhelmingly supports the proposition that a physically and developmentally normal boy or girl is indeed what he or she appears to be at birth.
The problem is that cities and broken nuclear family units, combined with chaotic and uncertain futures due to industrialized capitalism traumatize children for life, and GD and other sexual disorders are merely a symptom. We need to be fixing the causes, not treating the symptoms.

besides the obvious such as uncle ted, what are some essential anti-tech books?