/lit/ - Literature

>>17952999
You utterly infantile stimuli addled retards debating over the gender inclusiveness of his statement are so painfully contemporary in your analysis: you latch on, like a tick, to the most readily accessible spot without surveying the body at large. This:
>In reality, the successive sexual experiences accumulated during adolescence undermine and rapidly destroy all possibility of projection of an emotional and romantic sort.
applies to all genders and is a profound observation on the unparalleled accessibility of sexual self-gratification. It doesn't matter whether thr fault is male or female or any such banal this. No, for every human being, the aforementioned quote is true—your pace at the beginning of a marathon doesn't determine your place at its end.

>>15971796
Yikes, Anon.

>>12869635
I... Hope things work out for you Anon. I'm going to bed, farewell and God bless your soul.

>When Ariovistus laid eyes on them as they approached him in his camp, he shouted out, in front of his army, to ask why they had come to him.

What did Caesar mean by this?

>>11297886
Are you fucking stupid? You can talk about the jews all day long on /pol/, but on a board that is SPECIFICALLY dedicated to literature, it's not too much to ask for that board to be focused on literature

Why do we keep having a thread about this fucking book every week
It’s alread been disregarded by every respectable institution