>>16385610
>"hey can I have uhhhh... one refutation of Plato, please?"
>this is you
Zero brain activity. Here's the thing anon - it's not that Nietzsche's ideas are sacred, incontrovertible, perfect and the complete truth. On the contrary, they are very vulnerable and open to all kinds of criticism. Your problem is that you're incapable of understanding his ideas at all, so you naturally conclude that - assuming Nietzsche is wrong - he must be wrong about everything. The notion that his thought has had a colossal impact on world history because at least some of it may be necessarily correct seems to elude you entirely, hence you ask for a refutation of a person, rather than this or that of his ideas - which would be a perfectly possible thing to do. Worse - you have not even outlined what type of criticism actually interests you, which means that you're probably a 105 IQ drone, doomed to eternally repeat pop-sci and pop-phil talking points dependent on the "right/wrong" binary for as long as you live. A dreadful, unenviable fate.