/lit/ - Literature

>>18351994
But it is a flawed and underexamined clunky premise. It is a blind mirror. It isn't the nuanced portrait. Women precisely do not differ in opinion to any significant degree. Any existing awareness to disagreement is only open to masculine leadership to pry open through thoroughly bonded hardship. Without men guiding in such contention, they necessarily defer to the consensus of the lowest common denominator as this is maternal forgiveness in gracious action. Yes honey it's okay that you shit the bed. Mommy loves you. Daddy won't spank you senseless today. It is this hysterical suckling for fear of sharp masculine pruning that is the eternal enmity.
Man is more likely to be genius or fool to such a degree that men cannot exist without competition. Females exist in such similarity that competition is not even part of the vocabulary but equity in participation is the expected horizontal norm.