/lit/ - Literature

off-topic (that's twice) but i wish Baudrillard or Deleuze or Barthes were alive to write some kind of text of What Capitalism Meant By This. like, what's really going on here. what are we saying with this. besides decadence, obviously. but which heavyweight French post-structuralist could have given me the real story about what is going on with something like this. i think Barthes is the guy i want here, nasal irrigation and the smooth flow of cleansing scientific progress passing through your skull, replacing congestion with clean and fresh nasal irrigation. capital at the cutting edge, right next to your brain. this is what i want for my fucking soul. can we just put the tubes in deeper, so that it cleans out my entire brain? just sucks all this bullshit right out?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbVxQUI9FaE

>>12617114
>and continues this process of pure differences into his own system and explicitly rejects Hegel, and Landians read Hegel right back into it.
yes! this!

>The nature of Aufhaben is both to cancel out and preserve, which is exactly what Land did to Hegel and exactly what Landians do to Land.
aaaaaaahh! it's so true! ah, so good. Land would probably shit a brick if he thought people were using teleoplexy and dialectics interchangeably, but...why not?

i think i'm trying a different track these days myself, anyways, because...well, i don't know, just because. partly because the Landian blackpill has perhaps done its job for me in depriving both extreme left and extreme right socialism of their allure. i think on some deep level this was ultimately what i was looking for, and i think that's more or less been delivered.

the Hegel-Lacan bromance is well and truly a dope one.