/lit/ - Literature

The ancestors of this blonde aryan in the image would have said very similar things. His ancestral philosophy, before it's usurpation by Platonic Idealism, was also based on WISDOM, the kind that stems from generations of unconscious learning, not rationalistic KNOWLEDGE.

The development of the Socratic school in ancient greece is an aberration of philosophy, in contrast to the earlier Greek philosophy. To Heraclitus' 'no man steps in the same river twice,' a student of Socrates need more wisdom before defaulting to the Socratic method.

WOTAN

HONOR THE FOLK, HONOR THE GODS, HONOR THE ANCESTORS

>whole board rooting for monarchy and aristocracy
>butterfly and Foucault shitting it up with Marx and irrelevant modern analogies
>they see history in the narrative of economic & democratic progress
>calls rest of the board simpletons, dolts, children
>literally wasted energy typing this
>can't talk about the eternal & the heroic

Please stop and just read the other posts for a little while.

>>6330596
I only have a superficial understanding of stack scheme and motive, so I haven't read that. I swear you were the one who posted the grad books the other day? I am starting grad now.

I am too pleb to do algebraic geometry, what do you think about graph theory?

Historically the discipline was indistinguishable from physics up to the works of Gauss, and I'd consider Frege, Principia and that post-1900 development of foundational logic to be a math-philosophy interaction. So they provide tremendous benefits for sure.

But physics, philosophy and even CS don't have the cute quirks that comes with rigorous proving and being raped by the slightest misinterpretation of a statement, ya know? Their value to math has always been as a source of mathematical intuition (von Neumann wrote quite explicitly about this), not the actual deduction.

Then I consider the separations necessary, on the grounds that mathematical rigor should remain 'uncontaminated' (so to speak).

>>6206195
>devoting time to inform other autists of their autism
>resorting to attacks on sexuality
>all on the /scriptorium/ board of a Mongolian throat singing website
>better post fedora and euphoric

>>6165860
Your desire for Truth, Truth with a capital T, is one of the foundational scorns of N's philosophy. Nietzsche advocates for the devaluation of thinking in terms of the true/false dichotomy ("why not rather desire untruths?"). In the same way that you say he is arbitrary, he would call you a Platonist.

The strength of his philosophy is that it burgeoned out of aestheticism, but became much more. It was not the Ideal/mathematical approach of the Scoratic School.

Anyways, it's really up to you to move beyond your own critique.