/lit/ - Literature

>>17870361
Just off the top of my head??
The argument that people are individual pleasure seeking egos unmoored from all "essoteric" purpose in their base form and as such are logically called towards class consiousnes while also claiming Capitalism is
>"Undermining the family structure"
And this is somehow a negative against it (when by his own argument the family structure would be a product of the hierachy along with all other socio-moral structures of pre-socialist society)
There are more but i dont feel like debating so i'll just leave it with the one their should be the least amount of "Marxists" (who didnt read Marx) claiming he "never said"