/lit/ - Literature

>>15308977
A combination of A and E. I think it emerged from a lot of trial and error at the beginning of the species, and the most common results of that trial and error formed the empirical framework for non-contradiction.

I argue, though, that non-contradiction is just that -- another framework, like any other, which can be overcome and subverted. There is fundamentally no reason why it couldn't be, and I'd make that claim because the realm of human experience and empirical observation is confined to one part of what we know, or at least believe, to be a very, very large system. To think that the way we construct, manipulate, and view our world is the end-all-be-all seems incredibly short-sighted and almost childish to me.