/lit/ - Literature

>>22488500
Yes. Liberalism has always had a noble history of freedom, never coercion. It's only a very recent phenomenon that liberal states force people to do certain things. Therefore they aren't liberal anymore!

>>18520495
>I think I must tell you that I'm not putting evil as more essential or principal than good, I'm saying they coexist and one affirms the other.
Ah, so an infinitely good god made the Belgians cut off a 5 year old girl's hands and feet as a punishment for not harvesting enough rubber to affirm all that's good. Now I get it, this is also my conception of infinite goodness. Finally, you have proven that there cannot be good without evil, because if some Belgian didn't cut off this 5 year old girl's hands and feet then we wouldn't have any appreciation for all the other 5 year old kids who have a happy childhood not working on a rubber plantation.
Let's go back to the starting point of this discussion:
>>18519215
>Because there cannot be good without evil
I don't see a proof in any of your posts.

I dislike antinatalists but can't help myself thinking like them often

>>16766990
Heart of Darkness

How about this feel?

>>12408035
Cool b8 you made me reply.

>B-but white people are civilised would never cut off a childs hand and foot because their father didnt work fast enough

Fiction or nonfiction is fine.

>>11295342
>but antinatalists are all liberals