/lit/ - Literature

>>15931542
>CHRIST-DENIERS BANISHED THE FUCK OUT

>>15918886
Nobody is trying to gain immortality here on Earth. Why would I want that?

>>15918900
It is for many you'll see and argue with on /lit/. I have yet to see a convincing, non-utilitarian, AN argument.

>>15919038
The existence of bad does not mean we should not reproduce.

>>15919467
College-age white atheists and Pajeets/Nguyens are usually atheists. Can't blame them, they're dysfunctional bugmen, but no worse than me.

>>15919505
>do you want to reproduce and you don't care for the possible suffering of your child after and before you're gone?
Yes

>>15919565
Goodbye

>>15919588
Yes, but life is worth living despite suffering. Only those who can't raise a child well should not reproduce.

>>15919965
>who have no achievements in life
Their children are their achievements. Judging by your beliefs and state, I don't think the same can be said of your parents. The problem is, you don't have any salient arguments; it's just "lol this thing you care about sucks lmao >:P" It's kind of pathetic

>>15920286
Then let the dead bury the dead. I'll go on and argue with the living, and significant.

>>15920428
Give me more wisdom, prophet

>>15920975
That would be fine. The problem is they come on here and argue about their nothing. On the other hand, natalists make anti-natalists seethe by also doing nothing (not raising their children well). In fact, I can guarantee you most of the ANs in this thread are the product of a natalist doing nothing.

>>15922232
>maybe the problem is humanity itself
>does nothing to combat humanity except arguing on 4chan to pat themselves on the back for at least "doing something"

>>15922347
I've heard that argument a million times and it always fails because it's a reach, unless you're talking to a literal Cleetus living in a trailer park. Those types don't browse 4chan, or at least /lit/

>>15907210
Yes, but it will always be driven back by the hammer of SOMETHING, SOMETHING, SOMETHING

>>15828291
Get em moses