/lit/ - Literature

The amount of people here pretending like they know anything about Hitler, likely from reading his Wikipedia article and watching Downfall, MAYBE while also reading Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, is astounding; so many laughable assertions made with the utmost confidence.
As a STEM pure math-type person, I already knew that /lit/ people aren't exactly the sharpest tools in the shed, but jfc I had higher expectations.

>>12770434
I agree with you and I am a natsoc. There is nothing wrong with socialism if done right. It's just that Hitler and Mussolini were the only ones who got it right.

>>12428825
for (((you)))

>>11702969
>there’s a reason it was called national socialism

Obligatory

>It may be that money has become the one power that governs life to-day. Yet a time will come when men will again bow to higher gods. Much that we have to-day owes its existence to the desire for money and property; but there is very little among all this which would leave the world poorer by its lack. It is also one of the aims before our movement to hold out the prospect of a time when the individual will be given what he needs for the purposes of his life and it will be a time in which, on the other hand, the principle will be upheld that man does not live for material enjoyment alone. This principle will find expression in a wiser scale of wages and salaries which will enable everyone, including the humblest workman who fulfils his duties conscientiously, to live an honourable and decent life both as a man and as a citizen. Let it not be said that this is merely a visionary ideal, that this world would never tolerate it in practice and that of itself it is impossible to attain.

Hopefully this will shed some light on the topic, and stop this thread from devolving into political shitposting.