/lit/ - Literature

>>22325572
fucking kek

>>22165102
>her ass starts looking like a lazyboy armrest that mike tyson punched six thousand times until it permanently deformed and now just loosely hangs off the frame of the chair

>>20931684

>>20201508

>>18285116
Post more

>>17597973
>winds of winter
>coming out

>>17446085
mfw the 'Talk' page for it

Kidnapper vs. Activist
I noted the deletion of most references to Jackson as an "activist," and am prone to agree that the term is an inaccurate descriptor of his actions. However, I feel that the term "kidnapper" alone doesn't encapsulate the politically motivated nature of the Marin County incident, even if it is correct.

I'm not big on "revolutionary" as a term either. Would adding the descriptor "radical" perhaps be appropriate? Or perhaps eventually having a section describing the impact of Marin County as seen by the Black Panthers and modern-day fringe activists (Detailing the idea of it as the "August 7th Rebellion" and all that jazz). Blu3vibe (talk) 19:36, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Also... retitling the page might be a good idea. I'm somewhat n00bish so don't know how to go about that Blu3vibe (talk) 19:40, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Done I agree with most of what you have written. I think the best way to disambiguate the page is simply to add his middle initial. I have retitled the page as "Jonathan P. Jackson". Location (talk) 20:16, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Jackson is listed as revolutionary and the source cited is a radical left publication that is extremely slanted toward one viewpoint and seems to condone violence in the cause of "revolution" which is not clearly defined. Jackson murdered several people in cold blood who were trying to help his cause and seriously injured others. None of these people were engaged in a revolution nor were they engaged in any political activity. Revolutionary is an inappropriate term as it connotes fighting for a cause when all Jackson did was murder two inmates who were trying to help him and severely injure others who had nothing to do with the release of the Soledad Brothers. Agree with above about changing "revolutionary" to "radical." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:246:5980:8FC0:E567:8252:1288:F691 (talk) 00:08, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Your comment is baseless nonsense. Removing the tag now. Cheers. 2607:FEA8:BFA0:BD0:4C7:A4AA:8695:7B21 (talk) 19:24, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

>>17430064
>it's stupid to not walk through a Detroit ghetto at night because neuroscience and genetics are not yet understood

>Getting Filtered by Battlefield Earth

>>17204490
>nietzsche audiobooks

Even did a Monopoly metaphor where white people and chinese were multiple rounds into the game when we finally started playing with only shitty brown tiles unsold and how he would wish to be in jail just like with the boardgame.

In retrospect, it might've been too much but maybe he'll start reading books now.

(tried to explain cultural capital, too)

>>15290206
This nigga thirsty lmao

>>15288818
Wait I totally missed your joke lmao

>>15222016

>>14867872
>but on average blacks are smarter than whites now.

>>14807179
>society will inevitably progress to a stateless, classless situation

>>14668302
>Please read White Fragility & How to be an Anti-Racist