/lit/ - Literature

>>14046607
stfu Freud

>>13996201
Why are you this stupid anon? Freud yeah one should read a ton of his stuff for the history and a more in depth understanding of his theory. However just a few core books and essays/the essential Freud suffices. Lacan is interesting but his wrong on almost everything and I found nigh pointless to read even from the historical view. Kohut should only be read once one has actually established a core understanding of psychology, he isn't all that important desu and doesn't add almost anything. Wachtel pffffffffffff what a twat, entertaining to read but is a perfect example of what is wrong with modern psychology.

Jung though, the one best and most influential writer (second only to Freud) you just say is bad an advertise a crappy book to start for him. Man and his Symbols, the only good part of which is Jungs intro. The various other chapters are interesting but just cuts the corners of and bastardises Analytical Psychology. Archetypes sound like toys.

Your entire post is the product of what happens to an anon when they have a given interest and learn about it through the education system. Jung is by far the most originally interesting (with Freud an arguable contender) writer for history, philosophy, anthropology, religion, economics, linguistics, art, ethics, culture, sciences and of course psychology.

For Jung read(and I doubt you've read this):
>Modern Man in search of a Soul
>History of Modern Psychology: Lectures
>Psychology of the Unconscious
>Psychological Types
And so forth in at least chronological order but really you can pick a variety of his books out from here just not something like Aion or Liber Novus.

>>13850985
Jung was literally a Kantian and the man who wrote that quote is making a very specific example a generalisation of society. Just because there are a few morons who built off of Kant and were influenced by him does not mean it is Kants blame. Same is for Jung.

>>13781115
Jung you fucking pseud!

Freud's main theory's were so heavily influenced by Wagner's writings on psychology one could say there wouldn't be half of Freud without him. And even then his later theory's like on the complex were helped to be developed by Jung as well. And Lacan is just a moron.

JUNG! JUNG! JUNG!

>>13664722
TAKE THAT BACK!

>>13253522
>Imagine genuinely disliking Jung

>>12867226
>Alan Watts
>Instead of
>Carl Gustav Jung
>Choosing the copy
>the fake
>over the original

>>12836555
>Not mentioning Jung

>>12763818
>idk who could hate a man that made such claims as "The Woman does not exist" and even make feminists agree with him.

What sort of homosexual incel inferiority of a shit post is this?

>>12748504
WHAA...WHAT IS THIS MANNER OF INFERIORITY?