/lit/ - Literature

Well you see in the noumena all that remains are the inter-subjective decision making.
Therefore decisions made in the "world" affect the noumnon and the relationship that occurs between the subjects affect in "unnatural" ways the phänomenological subjects.
Some gay modern american philosopher said this, but it is quite right: ~ Love is the truest form of epistemology; you recognize the person for who they Really are and loose all the phänomenological crap.
>read Fichte

>>13757691
So if I understand correctly, one has to get a job of lifting a therapist in shower while getting a haircut. And then, only then will penis enter the vagina?

>/lit/ writes Lolita

I only want to read the Critique on Kantian Philosophy which is the final part of the first part of Schopenhauer's - The World as Will and Representation. Is this fine or will he refrence to frequently to the "solutions" he (possibly) had offered previously?
Is there any other direct Kritiques of Kant's work (especially the epistemological), such as in the idealist era Jacobi, or modern: PF Strawson, that (you) would recommend?

What should I read after Kant's three Critiques before I get into Hegel's Phenomenology of the spirit?
How much Fichte, Schelling, Hegel's previous works, lesser known idealists such as Meimon, Rheinhold, Schulze?
>I've already read Jacobi

ANALYTICAL STATEMENTS ARE IMPOSSIBLE!!!

EVERY JUDGEMENT (EVEN A PRIORI) IS SYNTHETIC!!!!!!

It is impossible for us to deduce from notions to further analytical inherent notions, since we will always need "Visual space" (Anschauung) to gain actual knowledge, since if we attempted to go from notion to notion we would be using empty knowledge(for both the first and inherent notion Visual space (Anschauung) is necessary); just as sole Visual space (Anschauung) without categories would be incoherent. This follows obviously a synthesis, making all judgements synthetic.

We need Visual space (Anschauung) for even the simplest numbers, not just their addition, but the numbers themselves already require this. There is no notion of 5 without Visual space (Anschauung), therefore making it synthetic, as I can not find the predicates in the notion itself but need Visual space (Anschauung) to think them to the notion. (Mind you this goes for 1 already therefore every greater number suffers the same)

Even Kant's most famous "analytical" statement is actually synthetic since we require Visual space (Anschauung) for it:

>All bodies are extended

We cannot from the notion of body deduce its extension, but with the need for Visual space (Anschauung)! Even the most abstracted predicate of body (extension) requires the form of space which we can only comprehend through Visual space (Anschauung), making it synthetic not an analytical statement.

THERE ARE NO ANALYTICAL STATEMENTS SINCE EVEN FOR THOSE A PRIORI WE NEED VISUAL SPACE (ANSCHAUUNG) TO AID US TO GAIN A NON-EMPTY UNDERSTANDING ( OR FRANKLY AN UNDERSTANDING AT ALL).

>inb4 someone tries to strawman me with the strawman bait "All Bachelors are unmarried" (filthy Frege)
>inb4 anon, doesn't get analytical: I UNDERSTAND IT BETTER THAN YOU BELIEVE TO YOURSELF

"Hey, thats not my Problem, I pay him to feel."

As much as I detest the notion of the work, I feel Lolita is one of those rare books that hits a trifecta of 1) beautiful poetic prose 2) strong, fast moving story and 3) large amount of tension/suspense.

Again, I wish it could have been done about a different subject but it attains things that are rare as fuck, that even Nabokov I don't think ever came close to recreating.

Anyone agree and have any others they think reach similar literary peaks?

>>10205975
I've never posted on pol, but having a few thousand autistic white guys barreling down to the root of sociopolitical matters is revolutionary and people will likely see its advent and coming of age as something uniquely transformative, if not just because it woke a fuckload of young white men up the jewish question.

>>9721321
just be yourself