/lit/ - Literature

>>22951370
That's a man. No hips. Trannies cannot hide the hips. That and the inner psychological distortions that are revealed in their outward physical and behavioural deformities.

>>21772022

>>20701340
Logic presupposes a problem in need of a solution exists. but if non-Aristotelian logic can be used to make sense of something as overtly material as gender identity, a dyadic relationship is independent of the identities of two parties. "all trans women are women" cannot be true if "no trans women are women." simultaneously, "some trans women are women" OR "some trans women are not women" are both acceptable claims within this all-or-nothing identity you've assigned. this dyad still holds regardless of the subject's identity. the only thing objective is the relationship between two individuals exist.

>>20349786
Everything by Aristotle is very very based. His ideas (for instance on telegony) basically represent how the ancients viewed the world and were also very influential (sometimes basically just copied verbatim) in how people thought about women in medieval times. So from a intellectual history standpoint it's also worth a look.

>>20019396
Gracias, first time I've seen the /lit/ version

>>16469465
I don't know who's more correct, but I would rather be around Aristotelians than Platonists, that's certain.

>>15557654
>>15557666

>>15540955

NAME FIVE WOMEN R E L E V A N T PHILOSOPHERS WITHOUT LOOKING ANYTHING UP GOOO:
1. Arendt
2. de Beauvoir
3. Butler
4. Kristeva
5. Irigaray

>>14111577
He stole that argument from a reddit meme, he obviously didn't read any of it.

>>13741888

What is the best morning routine for a fresh /lit/ mindset?