[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.17063809 [View]
File: 29 KB, 319x326, 4344375A-B7E8-44B9-A7FF-75D1D50CB12F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17063809

> there is no lack because lack on its owned is imagined, thus requires a transcendent structure of lack. This runs up against Deleuze’s more materialist view that we produce desire from the world around us like a machine, taking in raw material and creating desire
> all processes are productive, machine like, taking in raw material, produce flows to other process- machines
> Desire is “encoded” on the body by a social debt created by the structure of the social body
> Shizophrenia is a sincere expression of desire that repels the social debt and decodes capitalist desire
> They also use schizophrenia as a new way to think free from reason and coded desire. One where becoming is not halted by transcendent categories. Schizophrenics can freely interact with the world, reflecting themselves in there environment and letting there environment reflect in them.

I know I’m leaving some stuff out, especially there critiques of Hegel, Frued and Lucan, this was just the most important parts I pulled. Any problem with these? I wouldn’t mind a critique of my interpretation.
Also My wife is making cookies and you guys can have some.

>> No.17003846 [View]
File: 29 KB, 319x326, 1603948274782.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17003846

>>17003680
>It doesn't matter where it came from because it did not come from me. I don't have to care - its another spook that is alien to me. Its just another belfry in your head you care too much about.
You didn't even come from you. This just sounds like a mindset of surrender and enslaving yourself to your own fleeting desires of your ego. Endless novelty is it's own prison.

>Stirner's rejection of spooks is essentially a rejection of duty, a rejection of the obligation to serve things social abstractions such culture, family, race, community, any form of collectivity embraced by humanism for a radical nominalism that makes the individual, I, the measure of all things.
What if I like those things, and I like how they make me feel?

>I don't listen to my family when they tell me to do things, I don't respect my teacher's recommendations, I slack on the job when dealing with my boss, or just I don't work and learn how to survive off of begging and welfare. I steal and lie from people when I can get a chance to do so because it benefits me. When I face threats, I can use force or maybe deceit if I don't have the ability to do so. I don't serve anyone but myself.
None of the structures of society would exist if everyone thought like that. Life wouldn't even be possible if it wasn't emphatically and fanatically prosocial and life affirming. Sure, go ahead and live your life like that but you get absolutely zero empathy or mercy from me or anyone else who buys into my "spook".

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]