[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

/vt/ is now archived.Become a Patron!

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
>> No.18134134 [View]
File: 44 KB, 800x450, punch.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.18082461 [View]
File: 44 KB, 800x450, ,mhvikhckhjcjhycdxi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Actually a study by Dr McShartyFarty shows that 90% ofboo dingalings exist on a pareto distrubition indication teh epistemological validaty of of sir stinky dink bo binky's metaphysical thesis of booo booo goo goo nigga balls

>> No.17765034 [View]
File: 44 KB, 800x450, punchPepe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I despise God. I believe that YHWH exists and is an omniscient, omnipotent entity, and I will do my best to fuck him over.

>> No.16808863 [View]
File: 44 KB, 800x450, Punching_Pepe_Banner.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>talking bushes

>> No.16584632 [View]
File: 44 KB, 800x450, 1592944217142.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>that the ending of Mark is a later addition.
Only by following the Latin and Egyptian documents, the byzantine documents far outnumber the former fragments, even if their papyruses are physically older than the Greek Byzantine texts. Being physically older doesn't mean more genuine since they're all copies and the lack of the ending of Mark is likely an error of the copyist/translator.

before you call me biased (touché)
i am >>16584367

>> No.16451890 [View]
File: 44 KB, 800x450, 1592944217142.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.16402736 [View]
File: 44 KB, 800x450, 1592944217142.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.16367077 [View]
File: 44 KB, 800x450, Punching_Pepe_Banner.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>conservatives are people that want to preserve
This is correct, the rest is retarded.
Anyway who came up with this dumbfuck imaginary dividing line betweeting preservation and restoration that they supposedly need separate movements? How can conservatism be an ideology if it must always be yesterday's progressivism, lest it be labled "reactionary" and forever outcasted?

>> No.16191291 [View]
File: 44 KB, 800x450, 1592944217142.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.16158242 [View]
File: 44 KB, 800x450, 1592944217142.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Correlation always implies relation, relation always implies shared causal chain somewhere up or down the line.
As in.
>Real correlation always implies direct or indirect causation.

>> No.16098451 [View]
File: 44 KB, 800x450, 1592944217142.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


what the fuck is the point of reading porphyry's Isagoge if you then don't read Aristotle's Categories

>> No.15950734 [View]
File: 44 KB, 800x450, 1592944217142.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Yes, will you abandon the external world and yourself to stay true to only believe in the provable?

>> No.15941306 [View]
File: 44 KB, 800x450, 1592944217142.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>philosophically illiterate speaks
Damascius denies the identity thesis: “we can say, therefore, that knowledge completely accords with the content of knowledge, but it is not the content of knowledge.” Damascius criticizes the Neoplatonist theory of intellection and the identity thesis that underlies it, emphasizing the substantive differentiation between the knower and the known to show that the intellect never encounters its object, Being, as it is in itself. Moreover, he uses premises supplied from within Neoplatonic metaphysics to demonstrate this nonidentity of subject and object. There seem to be three steps in his refutation of the Neoplatonic identity thesis. In step 1 Damascius accepts Proclus’ theory of intellectual reversion but concludes (step 2) that reversion entails the nonidentity of the knower (intellect) and the object known (knowledge). Finally, in step 3, Damascius then applies this denial of the identity thesis to Neoplatonic epistemology and concludes that the intellect never knows Being as it is in itself, since the intellect can never be strictly identical with Being. It is this last application that raises the most interesting questions about Damascius’ own theory of knowledge. By analogy to the Skeptics, who assert that the intellect knows only its own pathe, and never reaches the object itself, Damascius concludes that the intellect knows its object qua object known. While the Skeptics maintain that the mind can only know the phantasia, or impression, Damascius renders this doctrine with the Neoplatonizing counterpart, that intellect can only grasp the phanon, or appearance, of Being. ...Damascius recommends that knowledge must be unitive or rather, that there must be a release from all knowing, if Being is ever to be encountered as it is.
As Damascius comments, in unified knowledge, the mind does not attempt to assimilate the object. Rather, the mind completely abandons itself and itself becomes the object; the object itself no longer exists, and hence the mind no longer desires to discover it. Here, one can no longer speak of intellect knowing being. Rather, because intellect offers its separate identity to the aspect of the One it contemplates as unity, it is not possible to posit intellect as an absolutely separate and distinct hypostasis. In quoting the phrase, “outside the intellect” from the Chaldean Oracles, Damascius suggests that intellect is not separate from the One. This nondual approach brings the One into all the hypostases without thereby collapsing them. Again using metaphorical language, Damascius describes the experience in which intellect disappears: “We attempt to look at the sun for the first time and we succeed because we are far away. But the closer we approach the less we see. And at last we see neither Sun nor other things, since we have completely become the light itself, instead of an enlightened eye”.

>> No.15848057 [View]
File: 44 KB, 800x450, 1592944217142.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>I, myself, doesn't need anyone else's perspective, God speaks to ME personally in all my decision.
kys you arrogant atheist wahhabi-protestant dishonest coward

>> No.15816909 [View]
File: 44 KB, 800x450, 1592944217142.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

also liturgy is never revealed rather is is composed by the inspired artists' rendition of hymns and prayers, anyone can compose liturgy, that we've lost the notes of the ancients doesn't matter muvh whe Plato in Book 2 of Laws says liturgy should be continually revised and added onto, always improved. This loss is nothing but a great field of free musical creation.
You picked the wrong fool to accuse

>> No.15739514 [View]
File: 44 KB, 800x450, 1592944217142.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

When you eat something you're sensitive to long enough your problems will be reduced (or rather you "adapt" psychologically), but once he began eating "only" meat and then a few months later tried something which then showed itself to be one of the things he was most allergic to, then OBVIOUSLY the reaction will be extreme since his system has been "reset" and not used to it like before.
If you're allergic to anything hard to avoid this is common experience: like having cats: be away from your cats, who you've now gotten "used" to, for a week or more, you'll have a stronger reaction once you get home.
Milk sensitivity is even worse, the more you drink the less bloated and braapy you get, but atop for a few weeks and it will fuck you up.

>> No.15732015 [View]
File: 44 KB, 800x450, 1592944217142.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

which is the case with all anti HEROES
hero's journey isn't the anti hero's journey, the former never becomes morally grey

>> No.15704999 [View]
File: 44 KB, 800x450, 1592944217142.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.15682005 [View]
File: 44 KB, 800x450, goinggiveittoya.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>Not reading the rest of your gay and unironically Moldbuggian logorrhea
I accept your concession.

View posts [+24] [+48] [+96]