/lit/ - Literature

>>16337375

20th century literature is basically the /lit/ version of making soijack macros of things you dont like. checking the date is a good way to filter shit that is:
>written by a woman
>written about women
>or minorities rights
>or degenerate sexuality and faggotry
>has a female mc
>attacks tradition/patriarchy
>attacks religion
>attacks rich people
>attacks whypipo
pffft yeah right, im not gonna read virginia fucking woof just because some university jews say shes part of the canon. i make my own canon.

Everyone on here is just a pseud. It's better to be ignorant and honest than pompous and stupid. All debate threads are pointless. No one argues in good faith, as to be expected. Literary discussion is the exact opposite of what this site attracts.Tell me the last time you actually had a good conversation on here.

This place is just a machine for making you angry. Anyone you are arguing with might just be baiting to make you angry. Anyone you argue with can just drop a wojak reaction image to invalidate your position or some used up /pol/ epithet.

Even the worst boards, /b/, /r9k/, /pol/, all have had social impact and at least made some memes. They are honest with themselves, they know their boards are bad. /lit/ is not and somehow still thinks it is a good place. There is nothing on this board of any originality. It's all washed up Wojaks, the same Nietzsche, Guenon, Schopenhauer, Land, and Evola threads time after time again.

As a testament before I leave this godforsaken place, I will depart with one final Wojak, a fitting goodbye.

>>14971920

Not explicitly literature

>>14022281
>reddit