/lit/ - Literature

>>17199140
Would you date an ill weirdo that might even have Syphilis just because he was famous?

>>14894987
What you've described is essentially Christian morality. I don't understand why you think that your principles are "intuitive" when the vast majority of all humans who have ever lived have not valued them very highly. If anything, it would be easier to argue that /pol/ack morality is more intuitive since it's far more widespread.

>>14375383
>muh fairness
>muh equality

>>9399000

>He thinks all Conties circlejerk over Marxism/Socialism/etc

I got news for you, kid.

>>9231027

>Marxism
>2017

Come on bro fascism is where the aktion is.

>>9166760

>2017
>Unironically espousing ressentiment

>>9155503

>decide to be a heroic Nietzsche impersonator

That'll do me, thanks.

>>9129878

Just terrible.

>>9104685

Point out that he is guilty of ressentiment.

Game over.

>>8986283
>>8986072
Well-being as you understand it – that is no goal; it looks to us like an end ! – a condition that immediately renders people ridiculous and despicable – that makes their decline into something desirable!

The discipline of suffering, of great suffering – don’t you know that this discipline has been the sole cause of every enhancement in humanity so far? The tension that breeds strength into the unhappy soul, its shudder at the sight of great destruction, its inventiveness and courage in enduring, surviving, interpreting, and exploiting unhappiness, and whatever depth, secrecy, whatever masks, spirit, cunning, greatness it has been given: – weren’t these the gifts of suffering, of the disciple of great suffering?

In human beings, creature and creator are combined: in humans there is material, fragments, abundance, clay, dirt, nonsense, chaos; but in humans there is also creator, maker, hammer-hardness, spectator-divinity and seventh day: – do you understand this contrast? And that your pity is aimed at the “creature in humans,” at what needs to be molded, broken, forged, torn, burnt, seared and purified, – at what necessarily needs to suffer and should suffer?

And our pity – don’t you realize who our inverted pity is aimed at when it fights against your pity as the worst of all pampering and weaknesses? – Pity against pity, then! – But to say it again: there are problems that are higher than any problems of pleasure, pain, or pity; and any philosophy that stops with these is a piece of naivete.

>>8900926

No.

This is an anti-ressentiment board.,

What are some thing I should avoid when writing?

>>8734277

I'll type it out from my copy of Portable Nietzsche, 4u:

>Christian and anarchist: When the anarchist, as the mouthpiece of the declining strata of society, demands with a fine indignation what is "right," "justice," and "equal rights," he is merely under the pressure of his own uncultured state, which cannot comprehend the real reason for his suffering - what it is that he is poor in: life. A causal instinct asserts itself in him: it must be somebody's fault that he is in a bad way.

>Also, the indignation itself soothes him; it is a pleasure for all wretched devils to scold: it gives a slight but intoxicating sense of power. Even the plaintiveness and complaining can give like a charm for the sake of which it endures it: there is a fine dose of revenge in every complaint; one charges one's own bad situation, and under certain situations, even one's own badness, to those who are different, as if that were an injustice, a forbidden privilege. "If I am canaille, you ought to be too" - on such logic are revolutions made.

>Complaining never does any good: it stems from weakness. Whether one charges one's own misfortune to others or to oneself - the socialist does the former; the Christian, for example, the latter - really makes no difference. The common and, let us add, the unworthy, thing is that it is supposed to be somebody's fault that one is suffering; in short, the sufferer prescribes the honey of revenge against his suffering.

>The objects of this need for revenge, as a need for pleasure, are mere occasions: everywhere the sufferer finds occasion for satisfying his little revenge. If he is a Christian - to repeat it once more - he finds them in himself.

>The Christian and the anarchist are both decadents. When the Christian condemns, slanders, and besmirches "the world," his instinct is the same as that which prompts the socialist worker to condemn, slander and besmirch society. The "last judgement" is the sweet comfort of revenge - the revolution, which the socialist worker also awaits, but conceived a little farther off. The "beyond" - why a beyond, if not as a means for besmirching this world?

Staggered for your reading pleasure.

>>8712135

>you've have to admit you are already a little bit marxist

Heh, cute.

>>8681589

>it is naive of you to assert that you are apolitical
>I'm far left, of course

Yeah, I think we know where the naivety lies - and it's not with being apolitical.

>>8674707

Because it's easy to have a finger in both of those pies, therefore it saves a lot of time to hate both.

Marxism is the economic side of the coin, whereas Liberalism is the social side. In modern society, the two compliment one another much more than they diverge.

As for me, I hit 'em where it hurts.

>>8648545

>Socialism master race forever.

>>8633009

>Implying 20th century French psychoanalytic """"philosophers"""" are anything other than obfuscating hacks

Nietzsche would not have even so much as spat upon these ressentiment-filled betrayers of his philosophy.

"Pure" Marxism, divorced from identity politics, is still ressentiment par excellence. Herein lies the problem.

>>8621212

>Tfw you transcend ressentiment after years of having been a teenage Marxist

>>8599490

This shelf is pure ressentiment.