[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.19802713 [View]
File: 29 KB, 500x406, 022a58a3b6f396dca7a0a6d50b07b8b5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19802713

>>19802661

>> No.19785540 [View]
File: 29 KB, 500x406, 022a58a3b6f396dca7a0a6d50b07b8b5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19785540

>>19785160
Oh btw I mean absolute in this sense of beyond Subject and Object like with Fichte and his Absolute I there is this undetermined pure space that is not yet checked or determined from without. I think Bataille's notion of Sovereignty is a good way to simplify this, since Sovereignty is that which is for itself (I am who I am, for-itself, etc...). While Deleuze may not talk about an absolute it's pretty clear that his pre-conceptual field points to the essence of the event-becoming as a form of this very Absolute which is productive of its own opposition or Oppositing. So that we can say paradoxically that this immanent difference is precisely the indifference point. I'm still looking into the pervasiveness of semiotics as a descriptor of this since I feel that the Logos as emission-sign-reception is very important to unravelling the formation of active and reactive force and as a result the WTP, Overman, Control Society, Discursive Power, etc... A sort of non-phenomenology of power.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]