/lit/ - Literature

>>22488964
>the loser on 4chan sat at the fire and he wept
>the skeletal hands of his slat like and warped body sunk into the ash
>papa no
>I mean it boy
>don't make me touch you again in your deep hole
>no papa no i dont want the bad touch
>together father and son sat under the blasted sky and shivered
>because the boy was a fag

>>16501509
I read about half of the Phenomenology (original language): to me it was just chapter after chapter of stating the obvious in an unnecessarily verbose way. This I've experienced with every philosopher after Kant: Heidegger, Hegel, Wittgenstein, Sloterdijk, ... Yes, they do formulate their thought in more or less systematic ways, which abviously require no little intellect. Still, they are just feeling their way through a dark hallway. When reading Aristotle and Plotinus for example, I truly *knew* I ascertained to something. My knowledge of the All had intensified. Ever since Kant, philosophy has been a major cope imho

>>15507131
I do this and can confirm. It really is *that* easy.

>>12497009
>>12497028

>>11823799

>>7101150
>Credibility and social standing are a joke.
If you have neither, sure.

>>5104904
>who the fuck are you mysterious stranger?