[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture

View post   
  [?]In ghost mode, only threads with non-archived posts will be shown
File: 54 KB, 600x425, 1339489325985.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9160784 No.9160784[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

/a/ here, wondering what you guize knew about Tokiko

>> No.9160786

keep him

>> No.9160788

Everyone knows the true dark shitposting underworld is based in Finland

>> No.9160790
File: 24 KB, 600x600, jpchallenge.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9160790

>> No.9160789

Who gives a shit

>> No.9160797

>White Ren
Fuck you, White Ren#Chilly is our classical shitposting pseudonym.
You don't get to steal it from us.

>> No.9160792

Who's Abby

>> No.9160794
File: 19 KB, 250x250, 1338886842829.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9160794

>>9160790

>> No.9160799

>>9160797
http://archive.foolz.us/a/search/username/white%20ren/order/desc/

Probably Tokiko.

>> No.9160802

People tried to tell me he was a goon but he doesn't talk like one in person, so I don't know.

Wouldn't it be funny if the shitposters turned out to be the good guys?

>> No.9160804

>>9160802
>in person
Wait, do you live near him or something?

>> No.9160813

>>9160804

I travel. As for what's afflicting /jp/, I don't think the effortless spam posting is really the problem. It's like blaming bacteria for the wound they're in. I've seen good threads deleted for no reason, so of course no one is going to put effort into something that will only last a few seconds.

A fish tends to rot from the head down, as they say.

>> No.9160815

>>9160797
you mean to say it's not one person?!
my world is ruined.

>> No.9160819
File: 450 KB, 1946x1482, nig.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9160819

>> No.9160821

>>9160784
Tokiko is a single poster who likes to troll.

White Ren is a public trip.

The end.

>> No.9160826

>>9160813

Never mind the fact that two mods in chat have said they wanted /jp/ deleted.

I do not really think that Tokiko is the problem here.

>> No.9160827

At this current point in time, I don't think Tokiko is actively posting, so it's best to let sleeping dogs lie.

>>9160802
Most people don't talk in real life like they post on the internet.

>> No.9160838

>>9160819
Robert is so cute~

He has that dumb boyish look I like~

>> No.9160840

>>9160826
Tokiko is not "the problem," by himself because he is one poster.

>Never mind the fact that two mods in chat have said they wanted /jp/ deleted.
People in this /jp/ say this every week. Even moot has as much as said that /jp/ is a shit board that shouldn't exist, but nobody fucking cares because it doesn't matter.

>>9160813
Can you link me some? I'm just curious.

>> No.9160841

>>9160827

He doesn't chat like it either. Not even on &hdaed on the private server.

>> No.9160848

>>9160840

Also, the janitor lost my respect when he started coming into threads and defending his shitty actions.

AoC is a fool.

>> No.9160849
File: 284 KB, 916x749, pic0.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9160849

>>9160838
He's not cute, he's just ugly.

>> No.9160851

>>9160848
>Also, the janitor lost my respect when he started coming into threads and defending his shitty actions.
If I were the janitor, nobody would be allowed to read your posts ever again.

>> No.9160853

>>9160849

I'd hit it and feel like a pedo for a month afterwards.

>> No.9160854

Please don't give Tokiko more attention than he already gathers himself.

>> No.9160859

>>9160851

He did do it, though. NSJ has a unique writing style and tends to say the same things both here and in chat. You really can tell. It's unfortunate that he's such an asshole, but until the investigation concludes, there's no way to do anything about it.

>> No.9160860

>>9160859
Is it decided that AoC is the new janitor? I heard it was kkx.

>> No.9160864

>>9160859
People accuse literally everyone in a thread who defends moderation of being NSJ. How can you even tell when one of them is him?

>> No.9160868

>>9160864
Easy, NSJ is the only one standing up for himself.

>> No.9160870

>>9160860
I thought people were saying it was wtH.

I can't keep up.

>>9160868
Flawless logic.

>> No.9160875

>>9160864

Because of the way he talks, the way he structures his sentences, the retorts he defaults back to when he's pressed or can't argue a point, and so on. He's really got that whole "spent so much time in IRC it gave him brain problems" milieu about him. His thinking's ossified. That's part of what makes him such a bad janitor.

>>9160860
Last I heard, it was likely AoC. There are a bunch of people doing work regarding that both on Rizon and the other one, so it's going to take some time before there's a definite answer.

Anyway, /jp/ was fine before all the new staff started fucking it up.

>> No.9160877

>>9160849
Well I still think he is cute care to post more (non png) images?

>> No.9160879

The thing about Tokiko was that he never did harmless trolling. Threads like "You'll never get my tacos" with a picture of Cirno on a donkey or "Me and my mom" with an autist sitting with his mother. I could get why some people would be annoyed by what he did, but I always just saw him as being a lovable goof. Too bad he got namebanned.

>> No.9160881

>>9160868

well, really, who else in their right mind would

plus he probably goes on shitposting sprees when he's not deletespamming to make us think he's needed, so there's that

>> No.9160882
File: 500 KB, 576x768, tokiko_is_underage.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9160882

>>9160877

>> No.9160883

>>9160840
Not that guy but here's some that are at least somewhat on-topic.

http://fuuka.warosu.org/jp/thread/S9159018
http://fuuka.warosu.org/jp/thread/S9159064
http://fuuka.warosu.org/jp/thread/S9159689
http://fuuka.warosu.org/jp/thread/S9160266

>> No.9160888

>>9160879
>Threads like "You'll never get my tacos" with a picture of Cirno on a donkey

otaku culture, in other words

harmless, fun shit, for a fun board

but now we're all fucked and everything's ruined

sic transit gloria mundi

>> No.9160894

I heard that Tokiko's girlfriend was ticks in #jbcs. Was this just trolling?

>> No.9160893

so if i get a japanese ip can i post whatever i want because it's japanese and therefore otaku

>> No.9160895

>>9160875
That's astoundingly uninformative. If it's just being generally angry and calling people shitposters a lot, that's more than one person.

>>9160883
The only one that is actually on-topic is two, maybe four but four would have gotten canned for NSFW anyway. Not that they were awful threads, but that and on-topic are orthogonal.

>> No.9160899

>>9160895
I'd say that the only person deleting those threads was the OP, but then you'd accuse me of being the NSJ or whatever your Steam group is deciding to call him this month.

>> No.9160901

>>9160895

Why don't you tell me what's 'on-topic' and what isn't on a board dedicated to something as nebulous as "otaku culture". Also, why the board is SFW when none of us have jobs.

It's stupid.

>> No.9160904

>>9160901
Shitty blog threads and meta-threads aren't on-topic, that's for sure.

>> No.9160908

>>9160899
There is somebody in the moderation staff that hates please-respond-chan, janitor or not.

This is my primary complaint as of now.

>> No.9160907

>>9160901
1. All things otaku welcome!
2. This is the appropriate board for the discussion of Japanese visual and light novels. Western visual novels should be posted to /vg/, and translated visual novels are fine on either board.

>>9160904
What makes blog threads / meta threads against the rules? Just because you hate them doesnt mean we all do.

>> No.9160917

>>9160907
They're not explicitly against the rules but blog threads have always drawn negative attention (even though tons of people like to participate in them, nobody actually argues that they're on-topic and also people start complaining when there's too many) and metathreads are very obviously on-topic because they pretty much have no topic to begin with.

>> No.9160918

>>9160917
>not on-topic

>> No.9160919

>>9160917
The shitposters will spam any thread they don't like, so arguing that they "draw negative attention" isn't enough.

>> No.9160923

>>9160907

That would be great, except a janitor-recently-promoted-to-mod has open contempt for the 'ruhh-ruhhs' and sees them as an impediment to pushing his agenda.

We are in bad trouble.

>> No.9160927

>>9160919
When there's a whole ton of blog threads running around, people get frustrated that there's all this "/r9k/ shit" running around. Maybe the "people getting frustrated" are all one or two people out to shit up the board, but that's unlikely.

>> No.9160928

>>9160908
So I'm not the only one that feels that way.

>> No.9160932

>>9160927
>one or two people out to shit up the board
The first Steam group had 75 members, the current one has around 20. There are definitely more than just two shit posters.

>> No.9160930

>>9160917

People will complain about any fucking thing. Who cares? If you start taking things out of the stew because people don't like them, soon you'll be eating hot water for dinner.

>> No.9160941

>>9160899
OP of the 3rd thread here, I didn't delete shit.

>> No.9160942

>>9160932

There is no definition for "shitposting", it's just a way of saying "whatever I don't like". Also, I think you're making up these Steam groups.

>>9160927

It's more likely than you think.

>> No.9160944

>>9160932
People were complaining about blog threads long before the "official /jp/ steam poster group" was around..

>> No.9160949

>>9160942
http://steamcommunity.com/groups/shitpstr
http://steamcommunity.com/groups/shitpster
#tokiko (IRC channel)

There are several shitposting groups.

>> No.9160952 [DELETED] 

>>9160942
It's highly unlikely that there's a large group of shitposters who, instead of spamming the board with shitty threads, just quietly lurk until a blog thread disappears, and then the twenty of them get together, conspire to make five to ten disapproving posts, and then leave.

>> No.9160960

The same thing happened with /tg/. It used to be a fun, cool board, but then that guy sperged out and turned it into a Proper Respectable Forum For Good Posting (tenbux tenbux). Now they're trying to do the same here, but since we're a different breed, they're having much worse luck. It's kind of funny.

>> No.9160964

>>9160942
It's highly unlikely that there's a large group of shitposters who, instead of spamming the board with shitty threads, just quietly lurk until a blog thread appears, and then the twenty of them get together, conspire to make five to ten disapproving posts, and then leave.

>> No.9160969

>>9160960

You will never
>sadfrog.png
domesticate 4chan

>> No.9160975

>>9160960
I only visit for MtG threads once in a full moon, but I heard that /tg/ was getting overrun by borderline porn threads for a while before the moderators instituted no-fun-allowed.

>> No.9160982

>>9160975
Not just porn, gay furry RPing. Same thing happened in /vp/ for a while.

>> No.9160993

>>9160982

What we've got now is no better. I'd rather hide threads I don't like than have ones I do deleted.

>> No.9160995

>>9160982
I thought /vp/ was always gay furry RP.

>> No.9161001

>>9160975
>moderators

It's one guy who views /tg/ as his personal board. Incidentally, word on the street is he was bullied by furries and that's why he hates them.

>> No.9161014

>>9161001

So the bullied go on to become bullies. A vicious cycle.

>> No.9161023

>>9161014
It still doesn't make sense to me how a loser could get revenge on bullies by being a nazi on 4chan.

>> No.9161025

damn you subhuman /a/ scum and IRC trash. one day I will get you shits.

>> No.9161037

>>9161023

It...

It doesn't really work very well, honestly.

>> No.9161042

HMM I WONDER WHO OP COULD BE

>> No.9161042,1 [INTERNAL] 

>>9161042
Good intuition, young man.

>> No.9161042,2 [INTERNAL] 

>Abby
aka dunfuckwithmyfriend.
http://imgur.com/kOD0z

>> No.9161042,3 [INTERNAL] 

>>9161042,1
Kill yourself.

>> No.9161042,4 [INTERNAL] 

Why are chink bitches the worst kind of bitches?

>>
Reply to thread [?]Don't expect anything heroic. Your post will not be uploaded to the original board.
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action