[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 590 KB, 1024x1024, cc992254ce614799fa8992d40bd623aacfd4385d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8673721 No.8673721 [Reply] [Original]

Please respond general

>> No.8673726
File: 52 KB, 331x331, plsrealicry.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8673726

>> No.8673727

That's not how the joke works and fuck you for posting Satori

>> No.8673728

Just came twice in a row I can't remember the last time I did that.

Good night /jp/.

>> No.8673730

Can we instead post some pictures of Satori~n being abused

for some reason i like them and a part of me wants to whiteknight her.

>> No.8673734

Responding to a please respond thread.

>> No.8673739
File: 208 KB, 1328x885, 24347013.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8673739

>>8673727
>>8673728
>>8673730
>>8673734
They responded

>> No.8673743

Satori is amazing. Please don't "ruin" her by making it into a meme which would result in those threads getting deleted.

I asked this in the other Satori thread, but it was deleted before I got an answer: What does Satori sound like and what does Satori smell like? Why is there pink-haired version and a violet-haired version?

>> No.8673751

>>8673743
No you didn't

>> No.8673754

>>8673751
Check post 8670105 on the archive.

>> No.8673768

>>8673743
I'm my head she sounds like homuhomu and smells like chamomile shampoo

>> No.8673782
File: 275 KB, 550x600, 23818347.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8673782

>>8673739
You didn't ask what she sounds like

>> No.8673803

>>8673782
I suppose you're right about that, but it was the topic of the thread: why would have I repeated it? Too there were only a few replies to that question.

>> No.8673817
File: 145 KB, 1173x843, 25587800.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8673817

>>8673803
Please don't say you said things you didn't say

>> No.8673894

>>8673817
What I can say is that I had *thought* about it and then I noticed that thread, then I wrote a response asking for what I wanted to know, but didn't bother restating the question which was already asked by the OP of that thread.

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action