[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 22 KB, 849x414, loli.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7860807 No.7860807 [Reply] [Original]

>search for "loli" on danbooru
>927 empty pages
Why? What is an image db without 2D loli? Nothing!

>> No.7860813

think of the children

>> No.7860812

Pay 10 bucks or use gelbooru

>> No.7860817

>>7860812
This, give Fadbooru your credit card information to access loli.

>> No.7860816
File: 210 KB, 599x599, 1255617298697.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7860816

>danbooru
>loli

>> No.7860818

>danbooru

It's shit.

>> No.7860819

nice greentext faggot

>> No.7860822

gelbooru is better better booru

>> No.7860824

Shit man, did you just wake up from a coma or something?

>> No.7860840

>>7860822
Not really. So much more garbage on there to sift through.

>> No.7860843

>>7860840

it's your own fault for not searching the proper tags when looking for specific shit then.

>> No.7860851

>>7860843
Even with proper tags, there's a ton of shitty art to go through. More so than danbooru.

>> No.7860849

This is actually one of the reasons I primarily use Danbooru.

>> No.7860908

Danbooru? saged, reported, hidden, called Chris Hansen

one step up from shitkaku's booru, but still a piece of shit

>> No.7861225

>>7860849
What are you, a faggot?

>> No.7861232

Pretty sure you can access them with a plugin or with an upgraded account. Or query API directly.
If you don't want to mess with greasemonkey scripts or query the API directly, just use gelbooru instead.

>> No.7861276

>>7861225
Says the one lusting over flat chests?

>> No.7861284

>>7861276
>little girls' delicious flat chest
And?

>> No.7861291

>>7861276
For me it's more the small bodies and cute tummies than their flat chests.

>> No.7861322

>>7861276
>Not liking a little girl's chest
You faggot.

>> No.7861337

Sorry if not all of us want to fuck little boys.

>> No.7861350

>>7861322
See, I really have no problem against people that like 2d loli, but to act as if if you don't like them you're somehow homosexual is pretty damn stupid.

>> No.7861352

>>7861337
Sorry if not all of us are such faggots

>> No.7861360

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/danbooru/
Now go away.

>> No.7861482

>>7861360
Bumping to spite you.

>> No.7861491

>>7861276
>>7861337
>>>/b/
>>>/adv/
>>>/soc/
>>>/school/

>> No.7861499

>>7861491
>implying you have to be a pedophile to browse /jp/

>> No.7861504

Just because you have a chemical imbalance in your brains that make you feel attracted to children doesn't mean you have to force it on the rest of us.

>> No.7861510

>>7861499
>implying that /jp/ users should get retardedly buttmad over pedophiles like hardcore Catholics

>> No.7861514
File: 54 KB, 529x547, 1312870444850.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7861514

>>7861504
>chemical imbalance

>> No.7861520

>>7861510
No my reading-impaired friend, it is the pedophiles who are getting buttmad at those who aren't in this thread.

>> No.7861552

>>7861520
0/10

>> No.7861557

>>7861552
He's right though. I think you're both stupid.

MY TASTES > YOUR TASTES

>> No.7861563

>>7861557
>I'm right though. I think we're both stupid.

Fixed that for you.

>> No.7861565

>>7861360
>Not available for Firefox 6.0.2

How efficient!

>> No.7861574

>>7861563
Whatever gets you to agree you were being a dolt.

>> No.7861596

>>7861574
>changing a quote = agreeing

What are your learning disorders?

>> No.7861632

>>7861596
Your trolling level is still quite low. I suggest you practice some more on /a/.

>> No.7861648

>>7861632
I really don't have much more to say about your retardation, but I need to bump the thread.

>> No.7861654

What the fuck is with the NORMALFAG IS LEEJUN guys lately? Reported, saged, hidden, etc

>> No.7861658

>>7861654
Can you even read? Are you able to comprehend what went on in this thread?

>> No.7861658,1 [INTERNAL] 

>>7861654
It's shocking how blind you are.

>> No.7861675

>>7861658
What are you even trying to do?

You seriously can't be ignoring or missing all of the anti-pedo shit, but you can't be trolling either because it's way too obvious. Do you think loli is being "pushed" on everyone because of OP's post or something? That'd be stupid too, since you can just ignore the thread.

>> No.7861686

>>7861675
...

>>7860849
Statement.
>>7861225
Offense.
>>7861276
Defense.
>>7861322
Offense. (repeated, still baseless)
>>7861350
Defense.
>>7861352
>>7861337
Honestly I'm not sure which side these are on, so whatever.
>>7861491
Continued buttflustery over defensive remarks.
Seriously, it's not even anti-pedo. It's more neutral than anything else.
>Do you think loli is being "pushed" on everyone because of OP's post or something?
Didn't even take OP's post into consideration.

>> No.7861697

>>7861686
---

>>7861504
and
>>7861337

Are definitely random anti-loli remarks randomly thrown in. The fags arguing is debatable and does even out to be neutral. Either way, pointless shit thread. Saging and moving on bro.

>> No.7861844

>>7861697
Damn, you're good. Both of those are mine and my only posts in this thread.

>> No.7861844,1 [INTERNAL] 

>>7861565
Then use http://wescript.net/scripts/3238 instead.

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action