[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 270 KB, 1818x934, sexual deviation.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7487752 No.7487752 [Reply] [Original]

Has Japan covered everything on this diagram yet?

I'm a little annoyed that 2D is categorized as a subset of furry

>> No.7487759

2D categorized as pedo and non-consenting.

>> No.7487784
File: 176 KB, 1280x1024, 1176792083354.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7487784

The hell is robot and doll fetish related to sleeping, necrophilia, and transformation?

Also there's no such thing as a 'plushie.' See this image? this is hot. What could a 'plushie' do that's any different?

>> No.7487790

>>7487784
>The hell is robot and doll fetish related to sleeping, necrophilia, and transformation?
Because
>not alive
>like sleeping
>not human
And plushies are plushies.

>> No.7487794

>>7487784
dolls don't move, sleeping people don't move
robots transform (see the show transformers)
robots and dolls aren't really alive, dead people aren't alive

>Also there's no such thing as a 'plushie.'
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plushophilia

check and mate

>> No.7487814

>>7487794
>What could a 'plushie' do that's any different?

Sounds like it's just people humping on stuffed animals. Not much more of a fetish than humping on a table ledge.

>> No.7487819

>>7487814
don't tablesecute me, man

>> No.7487822

>>7487790
Oh I forgot to reply to this.

A robot is mobile and animate. How is it like sleeping or being dead? It's basically a replica of life. Are Rozen Maidens necrophilia? Is a Chii a sleeping chick?

>> No.7487826

>>7487814
Less splinters in the crotch though.

NOT THAT I WOULD KNOW OR ANYTHING! JUST SPECULATION!

>> No.7487832
File: 392 KB, 1600x1800, 1302162241003.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7487832

>> No.7487836

Which Ikea would you fuck?

>> No.7487849

>Notably high ratio of female fetishists.
Yep.

>> No.7487867

>>7487849
If this image is right, women want to be injured sickly loli vampires who fuck and devour animals until they swell up with cum and blood.

>> No.7487871

Where does Kigurumi go on there? They're sort of like the furries of anime but it seems like a rubber clothes kinda thing.

>> No.7487881

I like how necrophilia is in "non-consenting partners"

>> No.7487891
File: 21 KB, 240x280, a9c70f803a98.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7487891

It Who is not to be Named

>> No.7487900

>no rape
Not even serious.

>> No.7487921
File: 444 KB, 800x1000, 1258521896647.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7487921

>>7487752
>incest
>non-consenting

>> No.7487960

I like how pedophilia is in non-consenting partners, as the idea of minors unable to give legal consent is a very modern idea. (especially dumb for ephobiphilia to be a subset there as there is nothing fetishistic about liking developed teen girls).

The asshole who made this probably thinks that pedos only like little girls for the power they hold over children. what a real medded up ass.

>> No.7488029

>>7487960
What are you talking about? Science says that children can't possibly give consent until the second they turn 18.

>> No.7489254

>>7487960
>The asshole who made this
is a woman. Figures.

Bestiality under non-consenting partners? What if the animal is the one initiating?

>> No.7489266

>>7489254
Obviously, even if he initiates, he can't consent, because he's not a adult human being.

>> No.7489267

>>http://stallman.org/archives/2003-may-aug.html
>For necrophilia, it might be necessary to ask the next of kin for permission if the decedent's will did not authorize it. Necrophilia would be my second choice for what should be done with my corpse, the first being scientific or medical use. Once my dead body is no longer of any use to me, it may as well be of some use to someone. Besides, I often enjoy rhinophytonecrophilia (nasal sex with dead plants).
Glorious Stallman.

>> No.7489275

>>7488029
>Science says that children can't possibly give consent until the second they turn 18.
Not science, law.

>> No.7489292

>>7489275
He was joking bro.

>> No.7489304

>>7489266
implying consent needs to be verbal, faggot.

>> No.7489338

>>7489267
I'm with Stallman here. As the highest expression of modesty, in reaction against lavish burials and services, I shall choose to be raped in death.

>> No.7489513

>>7489338
Have you learned nothing? You can't rape dead people.

>> No.7489520

>>7489513
Uh... they always consent?

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action