[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture

View post   
  [?]In ghost mode, only threads with non-archived posts will be shown
File: 687 KB, 1003x1217, stringtheory.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5100588 No.5100588 [Reply] [Original]

It seems like to the rest of the world pedophile is a synonym for psychopath, I find myself attracted to IRL lolis but I'd never rape or murder one... I've only ever wanted love and whole world is trying to make me look like a monster. How about you guys?

>> No.5100593

How can you even tolerate 3D? Fuck, that's awful.

>> No.5100589

3D lover go home

>> No.5100600

What exactly makes this wrong? What's the difference between a 12 year old and a 20 year old?

>> No.5100604

>>5100600
Tits. In Australia.

>> No.5100613

>>5100604
So my love can only be right if the girl I want has breasts?

>> No.5100611

>>5100604
You're now my favorite person of the day.

>> No.5100620

>>5100589
>>5100593
And the /jp/ hivemind arrives.

>>5100588
But, politics, even about lolicon, I don't think belongs here.

>>5100613
This is a pointed comment about Australia's classification policies, that say "If she looks under 18 she cannot be in porn"

>> No.5100628

Based on your picture I think you should be posting on /b/ or /r9k/.

>> No.5100631

>>5100628
...And the board rivalry crap.

>> No.5100634
File: 701 KB, 1600x1067, 1249236549547.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5100634

God I want to rape and murder her.

>> No.5100648

>>5100634
Oh shit I actually got an erection from this. I feel horrible. What's her name? I'm going to hell so I might as well know. Links would also be nice.

>> No.5100657

>>5100648
You are not going to hell. Mohammad and Gandhi had sex with plenty of young girls and they're basically saints in their respective religions.

>> No.5100658

>>5100657
What about Moses?

>> No.5100660

Don't drag down physics with your pedophile inclinations.

>> No.5100662

>>5100660
I think you mean pedophilic inclinations. Don't drag physics down with your bad grammar.

>> No.5100666

>How about you guys?

Well, like most normal people I don't have fantasies about fucking girls under 18, so I 'cope' just fine.
Stop being a faggot and acting out this whole persecution complex, you guys are almost as bad as furries on this site; let that sink in for a moment then shut the fuck up.

>> No.5100667

Don't drag down pedophilia with your dubious theoretical physics

>> No.5100669

>>5100666
Woah. Don't drag pedophiles down by comparing them to furries.

>> No.5100676

>>5100666
>He fancies the hags.

>> No.5100678

>>5100669
Don't drag down furries by comparing them to pedophiles. At least they like things with tits.

>> No.5100679

>>5100669
I'm just saying that whiny faggots like OP are making the comparison more ans more viable. I got nothing against pedos in theory, but when you guys start bitching about how the world is against you, "boo hoo I'm being demonized all I want to do is fuck a child is that so wrong, you just don't understand boo hoo" you really start to piss a lot of people off.

Just saying.

>> No.5100680

>>5100678
Pedophiles like things with boobs too. Just, very very non-existent ones.

>> No.5100681

>>5100658
Moses, Jesus, Noah and whoever all probably did it with lolis. Back then it was common courtesy to do so.

>> No.5100684

>>5100679
>I got nothing against pedos in theory

Well you should, it's child abuse. It's like saying you have nothing against murderers.

>> No.5100685

>>5100678
Who cares about those bags of fat? At least pedophiles fancy the same species, goddamn.

>> No.5100688

>>5100684
This is what OP is talking about. You aren't abusing a child by having thoughts about them. You are only abusing on it by acting on it. People who act on it are called child molesters but people (ie you) think pedophile means child molesterer (and usually murderer as well, for kicks)

It's like saying every gay man rapes men

>> No.5100690

>>5100684
Pedophile, noun. A person who is attracted exclusively to prepubescent children.

>> No.5100695 [DELETED] 

>>5100600
A girl over 12 isn't a child. Being attracted to one doesn't make you a pedophile.

>> No.5100706

>>5100684
Exactly why should thoughtcrime be punished? What purpose does it serve, other than stifling the freedom of people to think?

>> No.5100708

>>5100690
Haha, exclusively? I have no worries then.

>> No.5100718

>>5100706
>hurp a durp
If there are no people who have disgusting thoughts like "oh god look at that 8 year old I wish I could fuck her silly" then there will be no people who actually DO that. I like the system proposed where anyone (any man at least) who is going to be working closely with children should be tested for sexual arousal when shown pictures of choir boys and what not vs pictures of adult women

>> No.5100730

>>5100718
Being stupid is one thing, but it gets really flat when you turn to obvious trolling.

>> No.5100743

>>5100730
>he disagrees with me he must be a troll.
Getting pretty sick of this attitude.

>> No.5100765

>>5100743
Not much to argue against "If people don't think of sex they won't rape women, so we should take care beforehand and lock them away".

>> No.5100764

>>5100718
Should all men be tested for arousal before letting them work closely with women? Before I accept this you will have to show that a regular heterosexual man is significantly less likely to rape a woman than a pedophile is to rape a child.

Also, such a test would be easy as hell to pass. Do you get an uncontrollable boner from seeing porn with people around?

>> No.5100777

>>5100764
If you take straight men it's different, they can actually get sexual contact that isn't rape if they want it but if you take a pedo, no matter what they get the kid to consent to it's still rape. You're basically trusting them to be completely asexual and that's just not going to happen

>> No.5100778

>>5100718
I don't get aroused when reading through eroge H scenes. Why the hell would I get aroused from that, even if I was into choir boys? (even if I am a pedo, I'm not GAY)

>> No.5100782

>>5100777
>You're basically trusting them to be completely asexual and that's just not going to happen
Why isn't it going to happen? /jp/ manages just fine.

>> No.5100784

>>5100782
Maybe the part of /jp/ that doesn't like real women, but what we are talking about are guys who ARE into them, and underage ones at that.

>> No.5100788

>>5100777
>If you take straight men it's different, they can actually get sexual contact that isn't rape
Calling bullshit for obvious reasons.

>> No.5100790

>>5100777
I don't get any and yet I have no desire to rape a woman. This argument is entirely intuitive with no actual evidence behind it.

The difficulty of getting accurate results on the probability of raping a child among anyone attracted to children is one hurdle you'd have to overcome.

>> No.5100794

>>5100784
Yes, but so what? It is IMPOSSIBLE to protect everyone from everything. And giving up essential liberty to stamp out a few child abuses is a very poor trade.

>> No.5100799

People can't choose whether or not they want to be attracted to underage girls.
They can choose whether or not to rape underage girls, however.

This is an important distinction- if you don't respect people's right to free will, what next? Jail people who have political views that disagree with the present ruling party?

>> No.5100805

The "urge to rape", if you want to call it that, is an individual personality trait of the people who do it. You can't say "people who like younger girls are more likely to raping" and expect to get away with it.
And people who want to lock away people for their thoughts and their own little made up theories are everything that's wrong with the world.

>> No.5100811

They've actually done erectile tests (I forget what the real name of the test is, but essentially they stick something to your wang and measure how much it changes) for men looking at pictures of girls of various ages.

A clear majority had some degree of response to images down to about 12/13, i.e. pubescence, i.e. the time that girls become capable of bearing children, i.e. the time that instinctively they become possible mates.

The age of consent barrier is an entirely social construct, useful only for being a very blunt tool and thus easy for a government to wield.

>> No.5100814

>>5100794
This is a problem in today's society. We like to think that you can't put a price on human life which simply doesn't ring true when you look at what kind of decisions are made in politics every day. The saying should go that you can't put a price on the life of a person you're familiar with since the death of strangers is frighteningly easy to greet with indifference.

>> No.5100826
File: 188 KB, 960x1280, 1257679997375.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5100826

>>5100811
So most men would find this girl attractive in some way?
I think she's a bit old.

>> No.5100833

>>5100718
http://www.ipce.info/library_2/files/asb.htm
>Another argument for the normality of pedophilic feelings are the percentages of 'normal people' who are said to feel attracted to children (about 20 to 25%), and who react with penile erection to 'pedophilic' stimuli: more the 25%. One cannot reasonably argue that about one quarter of the population is mentally ill.

Educate yourself before saying something stupid.

>> No.5100836

>>5100826
Probably. I think she's a bit ugly, and when I noticed the belly-button piercing that just killed the whole image.
Not too old, though.

>> No.5100848

>>5100836
She looks better in other images.
She's upper limit. Over her is a no-go for me.

>> No.5100867

I saw some ptsc and pthc(including rape),

If I want, I can fap to this(I didn't find loli + dog videos, but I think I can totally fap to them too),
so according to wikipedain classification I'm as monster as one can only be(I don't remember the link, but the was some page that several kinds of pedo, and bestiality and violence were worst pedo level).

But fuck that shit.
I will better play lolicon - loli there are much more beautiful.
And H-scenes are better than cp. Also I'm not going to rape or murder loli - 3d pigs are disgusting. Even if they are loli.

>>5100684
> Implying murder is bad.
who cares?

>> No.5100892

>>5100867
I don't download CP, even though it gets me going, simply because I judge it not worth the risk. I can fap just fine to hentai, I don't need to chance getting ass-raped in prison just for some jollies.

>> No.5100897

>>5100892
in my country downloading cp is ok.
uploading is not.

>> No.5100911

>>5100897
In my country lolicon is technically illegal, but as "material supportive of child sexual abuse" rather than as child porn per se.

>> No.5100913

Fuck your 3d pig disgusting.

Loli eroge is the best. My fetish is little girls getting pleasure.

>> No.5100914

>>5100911
Worst thing is it has been tested in court, and Puni Puni Poemy is now illegal to own just because of the grade-schooler scene (which isn't even directly sexual). I doubt real loli would stand a chance.

>> No.5100924

>>5100914
Moral panics, not so good.

>> No.5100927

I used to be the same and liked IRL lolis and I felt extremely frustrated that people would misconceive my mentality because of that. I don't like anything anymore, though.

>> No.5100929

>>5100914
>Puni Puni Poemy is now illegal
Added to torrents.

>> No.5100943

>>5100914
Upon following this claim up, I have learned that that case never made it to the court, it was simply classified as objectionable, then confirmed as such in a review.

>> No.5100947 [DELETED] 

>>5100586
ｈ o w ｃ ｏ M ｅ y ｏ u s T ｅ A l Ｗ E ｂ s ｉ ｔ e ｓ M r . ｐ O o Ｌ E ? H o ｗ Ｃ Ｏ m e Y Ｏ Ｕ ｄ o n t ｋ n o W ｈ o ｗ t O Ｍ Ａ ｋ Ｅ y ｏ U r ｏ W N O ｒ I g i Ｎ Ａ l S t U ｆ ｆ ? U S h u d Ｔ Ｒ ｙ i t l U l ｚ ｈ t ｔ ｐ : / / 8 8 . 8 0 . 2 1 . 1 2 /

>> No.5100951

None of this shit ever makes it to court because everyone knows that if it actually got to the Supreme Court it would be shot down so fast it wouldn't know what hit it, which would probably add a fair bit of precedent to kill future attempts at making drawings illegal.

>> No.5100954
File: 411 KB, 479x500, christopher handley.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5100954

>> No.5100957

OP I'm with you all the way. But society always needs a scapegoat and pedos make a good one.

>> No.5100958

>>5100957
I liked things better when we had JEWS for that.

>> No.5100959

>>5100957
And a deserved one, too.
I know a lot of the stories are embellished maybe, but there are people out there abusing kids and anyone who isn't against that needs to be shot.

>> No.5100961

>>5100959
... Have you been listening?
Pedophilia =/= Child abuse

>> No.5100963

>>5100954
He didn't even try to defend himself. The problem is that idiots like Handley take the advice of their asshole court-appointed solicitors and plead guilty to something that he could probably win if he managed to get it to the Supreme Court.

>> No.5100969

>>5100963
And this won't ever change. If you think about it, it's not the smart ones that get caught with this shit. If he wasn't a zero-watt bulb he wouldn't be in court in the first place.

>> No.5100971

>>5100929
You're going to be disappointed.

>> No.5100975

>>5100963
Wasn't he the guy that was looking at loli on a government computer?

>> No.5100976 [DELETED] 

>>5100586
h Ａ V Ｅ Y o ｕ ｈ Ｅ a R D Ｔ H e Ｎ Ｅ w ｓ ? Ｔ ｉ N Ｙ Ｃ ｈ a N i Ｓ Ａ N i L Ｌ E g ａ ｌ ｃ l o N Ｅ Ｏ f ａ Ｎ ｏ ｎ ｔ a L k b b s ｈ t Ｔ p : / / 8 8 . 8 0 . 2 1 . 1 2 /

>> No.5100985

>>5100971
I'm not even going to watch it.

>> No.5101025

>>5100969
Dont ORDER IT ONLINE when you can DOWNLOAD it online for free.

pirates win this one.

>> No.5101027 [DELETED] 

>>5100586
ｒ e M o Ｖ Ｅ Y Ｏ u R i L ｌ e Ｇ a Ｌ c l O N Ｅ Ｏ Ｆ ａ Ｔ c h Ｒ Ｉ s Ｔ ｏ ｐ ｈ E R Ｐ o O ｌ e ｈ T T Ｐ : / / 8 8 . 8 0 . 2 1 . 1 2 / Ｉ s t Ｈ e O Ｒ I Ｇ i ｎ a ｌ f a g ｇ O t

>> No.5101037

>>5100971
It's not bad. It's just excessively random.

>> No.5101038
File: 260 KB, 688x889, 10393352.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5101038

DSM-V (the upcoming latest edition of a famous psychological diagnosis tool used by thousands of trained psychiatrists) will be removing pedophilia from the list of mental illnesses and simply classifying it as a paraphilia. This means that attraction to young children (which is the definition of pedophilia) will on its own not be considered harmful or mentally sick as long as it doesn't harm anybody else. This will be a huge stepping stone for the rights of passive pedophiles and lolicon.

Oh, and it seems society in general is getting more lenient towards pedophilia. Check out this thread:

http://www.christianforums.com/t7454365/

While there are a few close-minded people, the significant majority of posters express approval for this development. Take note that this is an explicitly Christian forum.

>> No.5101041 [DELETED] 

>>5100587
Ｓ Ｔ e ａ ｌ i ｎ Ｇ Ｉ Ｓ Ｗ r O Ｎ Ｇ m R . c Ｈ ｒ ｉ s t O P h ｅ Ｒ Ｐ Ｏ ｏ L Ｅ h T t Ｐ : / / 8 8 . 8 0 . 2 1 . 1 2 /

>> No.5101049

>>5101038
>Take note that this is an explicitly Christian forum.
I don't think Christians are really very anti-pedo at all- yes, they put on an act because everyone ELSE is anti-pedo but the Roman Catholic Church is still one of the only institutions that actively tries to hide the fact that its constituents are molesting children.

>> No.5101054

>>5101038
Well there's the fact that catholic priests have been indulging in acts of the flesh and they can't exactly go around shouting that a number of mentally ill people go and become priests. Maybe I'm just being a pessimist.

>> No.5101069

>>5101054
Christian != Catholic

>> No.5101076

>>5100684
well personally i don't find murder intrinsically wrong.

>> No.5101079

>>5101049

Typical American behavior. Most of the shit thrown at the Catholic church is a blatant lie. You smelled money so you sue priests and hope for a quick buck.

>> No.5101085

>>5101038
>passive pedophiles

What the fuck is that?

>> No.5101097

>>5101085
Presumably one who doesn't act on his thoughts, so it's just "Pedophile" but coming from people who assume it means "I fucked you're kids"

>> No.5101100

>>5100975
No, that's Whorely. stop confusing them. I always have to tell people they're not the same person. Stop living under rocks. Also, 1. the "lol handley is an idiot for getting caught the people who aren't idiots are safe" argument is just stupid. They rifled through his mail and found yaoi doujins, and because there was no pubic hair, they could be construed as underage. They used this to search his apartment and find loli doujins. He got "caught" because he actually bought the stuff while you all pirate it. Again I know there'll be "lol he bought it? what a fucking retard deserves what he got" arguments, but nobody deserves that. These are fucking drawings, and law that could get him even brought to court for this for any reason and any clause is completely backward.

For the people who are like "lol, he pleaded guilty, what a sad fuck, no balls" to him, firstly, even if he won, his life would still be majorly fucked for all the normalfags he's involved with finding out what a sick monster he is. Secondly, he was out of money to fight it.

>> No.5101112

>>5101100
>he was out of money to fight it.

This single thing illustrates the fundamental flaw in the US legal system. No trial should ever be decided by who has more money.

The right to sue is also a shitheap, and certainly related to the money issue, but separate from the cases at hand.

>> No.5101112,1 [INTERNAL] 

>>5100706
Big brother is watching you. Whether you think so or not.

>>
Reply to thread [?]Don't expect anything heroic. Your post will not be uploaded to the original board.
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action